Wait Times for Neurology Appointments in the Cognitive Care Pathway
-
By
-
Tabasa Ozawa
-
Soeren Mattke
-
October 21, 2026
Clinical Scorecard: Wait Times for Neurology Appointments in the Cognitive Care Pathway
At a Glance
| Category | Detail |
|---|---|
| Condition | Clinical topic addressed by the source article: Wait Times for Neurology Appointments in the Cognitive Care Pathway |
| Key Mechanisms | The article describes clinic, health-system, and policy strategies to address neurology access, as well as patient-, clinician-, and system-level factors contributing to delayed detection across the cognitive care pathway. |
| Target Population | Patients or participants described in the source article. |
| Care Setting | Care setting described in the source article. |
Key Highlights
- A cross-sectional telephone survey of 150 purposefully selected US clinics found a mean wait of 17.9 weeks for the earliest available neurologist appointment for a memory concern.
- Mean waits were 21.1 weeks at specialized clinics and 15.6 weeks at community clinics; the difference was reported as statistically significant.
- Earlier claims-based studies reported an average interval of about 50 days after clinician referral, but differences in methods may partly explain the longer waits estimated in this survey.
- The article describes strategies to address neurology access at clinic, workforce, and policy levels, alongside barriers earlier in the cognitive care pathway.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
- The article describes obtaining blood test and structural imaging results before referral as an approach that may limit repeat visits.
- It identifies insufficient clinician confidence in discussing cognitive impairment and limited implementation of standardized cognitive testing as factors in delayed detection.
Management
- The American Academy of Neurology's three strategies described in the article are shaping neurologist demand, strengthening the neurology workforce, and advocating for neurologist value.
- The article describes advanced practice providers as a way to expand the neurology workforce in the short term and attracting additional trainees as a longer-term approach.
- The article notes that AD blood tests and digital cognitive assessments may assist in prioritizing patients who could be eligible for amyloid-targeting treatments.
Monitoring & Follow-up
Risks
- The article states that prompt specialist evaluation may permit earlier treatment initiation among eligible patients.
- The article identifies stigma, denial, insufficient clinician confidence, limited implementation of standardized cognitive testing, and time and financial constraints as contributors to delayed detection.
Patient & Prescribing Data
People seeking an initial neurology appointment for a memory concern; the survey also modeled circumstances in which patients self-refer.
The article discusses amyloid-targeting treatments for Alzheimer disease and states that prompt specialist evaluation may permit earlier treatment initiation among eligible patients. It provides no prescribing regimen or patient-level treatment data.
Clinical Best Practices
- The article describes obtaining blood test and structural imaging results before referral as an approach that may limit repeat visits.
- The article describes AD blood tests and digital cognitive assessments as possible tools to help prioritize patients who could be eligible for amyloid-targeting treatments.
- The article identifies stigma, denial, insufficient clinician confidence, limited implementation of standardized testing, and time and financial constraints as factors in delayed detection.
- The article reports that the AAN advocates greater funding for community outreach and research and higher compensation for neurology services.
Related Resources & Content
Based on findings from:
Neurology Wait Times in the Cognitive Care Journey
Tabasa Ozawa, Soeren Mattke. Jama Network Open, 2026.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2855579
This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.