Outcomes Related to Anatomy, Function, and Patient Feedback After Anterior Urethroplasty: Can We Anticipate the Timing and Reasons for Reinterventions in Cases of Anatomical Recurrence?
-
By
-
Maite Miqueleiz Legaz
-
Felix Campos-Juanatey
-
Oscar Gorria Cardesa
-
March 11, 2026
Clinical Scorecard: Outcomes Related to Anatomy, Function, and Patient Feedback After Anterior Urethroplasty: Can We Anticipate the Timing and Reasons for Reinterventions in Cases of Anatomical Recurrence?
At a Glance
| Category | Detail |
|---|---|
| Condition | Anterior urethral stricture treated by urethroplasty |
| Key Mechanisms | Surgical reconstruction of anterior urethra using transecting/non-transecting anastomotic or augmented urethroplasty with grafts |
| Target Population | Adult male patients (≥18 years) undergoing open anterior urethroplasty |
| Care Setting | University hospital surgical and outpatient follow-up setting |
Key Highlights
- Success after urethroplasty is multifactorial: anatomical, functional, patient-reported outcomes, and need for reintervention should be considered.
- Follow-up should last at least 12 months with scheduled urine cultures, uroflowmetry, questionnaires, and anatomical imaging (cystoscopy or RUG).
- Asymptomatic anatomical recurrences occur in about one-third of patients at one year and may progress to require treatment.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
- Use flexible cystoscopy (17Ch) or retrograde urethrogram (RUG) to assess anatomical success at 6, 24, and 60 months postoperatively.
- Perform uroflowmetry with Qmax >10 mL/s and voided volume >120 mL to evaluate functional success.
- Assess patient symptoms and quality of life using validated questionnaires (USS-PROM and IIEF-5).
Management
- Define success as absence of anatomical recurrence, functional impairment, symptoms, and no need for further interventions.
- Consider less strict functional success threshold (Qmax >10 mL/s) due to variability and confounding factors.
- Monitor asymptomatic anatomical recurrences closely due to increased risk of future treatment need.
Monitoring & Follow-up
- Follow-up visits at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 60 months including urine culture, uroflowmetry, questionnaires, and anatomical imaging.
- Collect urine culture one week prior to visits to rule out infection.
- Use patient choice to select between cystoscopy or RUG for anatomical evaluation.
Risks
- Asymptomatic anatomical recurrence may progress to symptomatic disease requiring reintervention.
- Functional assessment may be confounded by benign prostatic obstruction, bladder dysfunction, or operator variability.
- Patients may be unwilling to undergo further treatments despite recurrence.
Patient & Prescribing Data
Adult males undergoing anterior urethroplasty with at least 2 years follow-up
Open urethroplasty techniques including transecting/non-transecting anastomotic and augmented urethroplasty with buccal or preputial grafts show variable outcomes; comprehensive follow-up is essential to identify recurrences and guide reintervention.
Clinical Best Practices
- Adopt a multi-criteria approach to define urethroplasty success incorporating anatomical, functional, patient-reported, and reintervention data.
- Implement a structured follow-up protocol with scheduled assessments up to at least 60 months post-surgery.
- Use validated patient questionnaires (USS-PROM and IIEF-5) to capture patient-centered outcomes.
- Educate patients about the possibility of asymptomatic recurrence and the importance of follow-up.
- Tailor functional success thresholds recognizing limitations of uroflowmetry and patient variability.
References
- YAU Reconstructive Working Group and stricture-fecta consensus
- Trauma and Urologic Reconstructive Network of Surgeons (TURNS) 2014 follow-up protocol
- Spanish validated USS-PROM questionnaire
- International Index on Erectile Function (IIEF-5)
- European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on urethroplasty follow-up
Based on findings from:
Anatomical, functional, and patient-reported outcomes following anterior urethroplasty. Can we predict when and why are patients with anatomical recurrences requiring reinterventions?
Maite Miqueleiz Legaz, Felix Campos-Juanatey, Oscar Gorria Cardesa. World Journal Of Urology, 2026.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00345-026-06335-y
This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.