Perioperative risk stratification after resection of brain metastases: internal development and validation of the dominant lesion surgery score in a 20-year single-center cohort - Scorecard - MDSpire

Perioperative risk stratification after resection of brain metastases: internal development and validation of the dominant lesion surgery score in a 20-year single-center cohort

  • By

  • Hasan Ali Aydın

  • Emrah Keskin

  • Murat Kalaycı

  • March 23, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Risk Assessment in the Perioperative Period Following Brain Metastasis Resection: Development and Validation of the Dominant Lesion Surgery Score from a 20-Year Single-Center Study

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionBrain metastases requiring surgical resection
Key MechanismsDominant symptomatic lesions causing neurological deterioration; mass effect; diagnostic uncertainty; cytoreductive surgery within multimodal treatment
Target PopulationAdult patients undergoing surgical resection for histologically confirmed brain metastases
Care SettingTertiary neurosurgical center within a multidisciplinary neuro-oncology framework

Key Highlights

  • Intracranial lesion count alone is insufficient for surgical decision-making; dominant lesion characteristics and clinical urgency are critical.
  • Surgical resection benefits extend beyond solitary metastases to selected patients with dominant symptomatic lesions or life-threatening mass effect.
  • Development and internal validation of the Dominant Lesion Surgery Score (DLSS) for perioperative risk stratification of early postoperative mortality.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Histopathological confirmation of brain metastases following surgical resection is essential.
  • Preoperative neuroimaging to assess intracranial lesion number and distribution.

Management

  • Surgical resection considered for dominant symptomatic lesions, life-threatening mass effect, or diagnostic clarification within a multidisciplinary treatment plan.
  • Integration of surgery with stereotactic radiosurgery and systemic therapies tailored to tumor biology and patient status.
  • Extent of resection classified as gross total resection (GTR) or subtotal resection (STR) based on postoperative imaging.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Early postoperative imaging to evaluate extent of resection and residual disease.
  • Multidisciplinary tumor board review for treatment planning and follow-up.
  • Survival and recurrence monitoring to inform ongoing management.

Risks

  • Early postoperative mortality risk stratified using the Dominant Lesion Surgery Score (DLSS).
  • Consideration of tumor biology, operative completeness, and systemic disease burden in perioperative risk assessment.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Adults undergoing dominant lesion brain metastasis resection in a tertiary neurosurgical center.

Surgical selection should be individualized, incorporating neurological status, systemic disease, and expected local control; DLSS aids perioperative risk stratification.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Use multidisciplinary evaluation integrating neurosurgery, radiation oncology, and medical oncology for treatment planning.
  • Prioritize surgical resection for dominant lesions causing neurological compromise or requiring tissue diagnosis.
  • Employ postoperative cavity-directed irradiation and systemic therapies with CNS activity as part of multimodal management.
  • Apply the Dominant Lesion Surgery Score to assess perioperative mortality risk and guide clinical decision-making.
  • Recognize limitations of lesion count alone; incorporate tumor biology and extent of resection in prognostication.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content