Associations between CT characteristics of lung cancer lesions and histologic subtypes in lung cancer screening - Scorecard - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

CT Features of Lung Cancer Lesions and Their Associations With Histologic Subtypes in Screening Programs

  • By

  • Erick Suazo-Zepeda

  • Geertruida H. de Bock

  • Noa Antonissen

  • Colin Jacobs

  • Firdaus A. A. Mohamed Hoesein

  • Hester A. Gietema

  • Grigory Sidorenkov

  • Rozemarijn Vliegenthart

  • Marjolein A. Heuvelmans

  • October 7, 2026

Share

Clinical Scorecard: CT Features of Lung Cancer Lesions and Their Associations With Histologic Subtypes in Screening Programs

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionHistologically verified lung cancers detected through low-dose CT screening, with radiologic features assessed by histologic subtype.
Key MechanismsThe study evaluates associations between nodule diameter, volume, attenuation, location, and volume doubling time and lung cancer histology.
Target PopulationNELSON screening participants aged 50–74 years who met high-risk smoking eligibility criteria.
Care SettingDutch lung cancer screening sites participating in the NELSON trial; retrospective observational analysis of screening and follow-up data.

Key Highlights

  • The study examined radiologic characteristics associated with histologic subtypes in histologically verified, screen-detected lung cancers.
  • Trained thoracic radiologists blinded to histology assessed lesion diameter, volume, attenuation, and location using standardized NELSON protocols.
  • The CT scan nearest histologic diagnosis was used to assess lesion features; volume doubling time was calculated from longitudinal imaging.
  • Two experienced thoracic radiologists retrospectively matched cancer diagnoses to index nodules using anatomical and morphological criteria, resolving discrepancies by consensus.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Histologic diagnoses were obtained from national pathology registries and assessed using the WHO classification of lung tumors.
  • Radiologic features were assessed on the CT scan nearest histologic diagnosis; VDT was derived from imaging at multiple time points.

Management

    Monitoring & Follow-up

    • NELSON screening included baseline LDCT and three subsequent follow-up rounds.

    Risks

    • The study population was restricted to participants meeting high-risk smoking eligibility criteria; findings may not describe other populations.
    • Nodule matching failures due to insufficient information about the cancer or nodule location led to exclusion.

    Patient & Prescribing Data

    Men and women aged 50–74 years who were current smokers or had quit within the preceding 10 years and met the trial's smoking-intensity and duration criteria.

    This article excerpt describes an observational imaging study and does not provide treatment or prescribing recommendations.

    Clinical Best Practices

    • Use standardized screening protocols and validated volumetric software when assessing nodule characteristics, as in the NELSON study.
    • When linking a cancer diagnosis to an index nodule retrospectively, apply predefined anatomical and morphological criteria and resolve disagreements by consensus.
    • Do not use PET/CT metabolic activity for lesion selection when it is not systematically available; it was not used in this study.

    Related Resources & Content

      Original Source(s)

      Related Content