Inferring temporal trends of multiple pathogens, variants, subtypes or serotypes from routine surveillance data - Scorecard - MDSpire

Inferring temporal trends of multiple pathogens, variants, subtypes or serotypes from routine surveillance data

  • By

  • Oliver Eales

  • Saras M Windecker

  • James M McCaw

  • Freya M Shearer

  • June 6, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Analyzing Temporal Patterns of Various Pathogens and Their Variants Using Routine Surveillance Data

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionInfectious diseases caused by multiple pathogens and their variants/subtypes/serotypes
Key MechanismsComposite surveillance indicators reflect multiple pathogens with distinct epidemic dynamics; Bayesian statistical modeling to infer individual pathogen trends from composite data
Target PopulationPopulations under infectious disease surveillance for pathogens such as influenza, SARS-CoV-2, and dengue
Care SettingPublic health surveillance systems and epidemiological monitoring frameworks

Key Highlights

  • Composite surveillance indicators (e.g., influenza-like illness) combine signals from multiple pathogens, potentially obscuring individual pathogen trends.
  • A general Bayesian statistical framework was developed to infer temporal trends of multiple pathogens from routine surveillance data.
  • Application demonstrated across multiple pathogens, locations, epidemic scenarios, and temporal resolutions, enhancing public health surveillance insights.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use routine surveillance data that include both composite indicators and pathogen-specific testing results for accurate epidemic monitoring.
  • Incorporate pathogen typing, subtyping, or sequencing data to distinguish contributions of individual pathogens or variants.

Management

  • Apply statistical models that jointly fit composite time series and component pathogen data to infer distinct epidemic curves.
  • Use inferred individual pathogen dynamics to inform targeted public health interventions and resource allocation.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Regularly collect and integrate data on pathogen-specific testing rates to adjust for time-varying testing and observation noise.
  • Visualize inferred temporal trends of individual pathogens alongside composite indicators for clearer epidemiological interpretation.

Risks

  • Relying solely on composite surveillance indicators without pathogen-specific data may bias epidemic trend interpretation.
  • Variable testing rates and noisy data can obscure true pathogen dynamics if not properly accounted for in analyses.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Individuals presenting with symptoms consistent with influenza-like illness, acute respiratory infections, or dengue infection under surveillance

Disentangling pathogen-specific epidemic trends can improve timing and targeting of interventions, though direct prescribing data is not addressed in this study.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Incorporate pathogen-specific testing and typing data into routine surveillance to enhance epidemic trend accuracy.
  • Use advanced statistical modeling frameworks to separate overlapping epidemic signals from composite surveillance data.
  • Adjust for temporal changes in testing rates and data noise to avoid misinterpretation of pathogen dynamics.
  • Apply findings to improve public health response planning and communication during multi-pathogen epidemics or pandemics.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content