Redundant terminology in infectious diseases: more than a harmless misnomer?
-
By
-
Enrico Schalk
-
October 7, 2026
Clinical Scorecard: Redundant terminology in infectious diseases: more than a harmless misnomer?
At a Glance
| Category | Detail |
|---|---|
| Condition | Precision and redundancy in infectious-disease terminology |
| Key Mechanisms | The authors define infection as microorganisms entering and multiplying within body tissues, while distinguishing it from colonization. They argue that “invasive fungal infection” is redundant under this definition, while acknowledging debate over whether invasiveness describes the infection or the pathogen. |
| Target Population | Not specified; the article addresses terminology in infectious-disease practice and medical publishing. |
| Care Setting | Not specified; the discussion concerns clinical terminology, antimicrobial stewardship, and manuscript peer review. |
Key Highlights
- The authors argue that “invasive fungal infection” is a misnomer because invasiveness is not unique to fungal infections and, under their definition, all infections involve invasion.
- The authors distinguish infection from colonization and note that colonization does not denote actual invasion of the body.
- They say “invasive infection” may convey severity, threat, depth, dissemination, systemic involvement, or difficulty of treatment, and suggest describing intended features directly.
- The authors state that pathogen detection alone does not invariably warrant treatment and give distinguishing asymptomatic bacteremia from symptomatic bloodstream infection as an example of precise terminology.
- The authors call for greater attention to terminology in clinical medicine and manuscript peer review.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
- Distinguish infection from colonization, as the authors propose.
- Describe intended features such as severity, dissemination, or depth directly when relevant, rather than relying on “invasive” alone.
- The authors give the distinction between asymptomatic bacteremia and symptomatic bloodstream infection as an example of precise terminology.
Management
- The authors state that pathogen detection alone does not invariably warrant treatment; interpret detection in context.
- The authors suggest describing the pathogen or infection more precisely to help prevent overtreatment or inappropriate treatment.
Monitoring & Follow-up
- Not discussed in the source.
Risks
- The authors warn that imprecise or redundant terminology may produce misinterpretation.
- They state that more precise terminology may help prevent overtreatment or inappropriate treatment.
Patient & Prescribing Data
Not specified; the article discusses terminology across infectious diseases.
No specific drug regimens are provided. The authors state that pathogen detection alone does not invariably warrant treatment and emphasize distinguishing colonization from infection.
Clinical Best Practices
- The authors suggest using precise terms to distinguish colonization from infection.
- Describe the pathogen’s characteristics separately from the features of the infection it causes, as the authors propose.
- State intended infection features directly, such as severity, dissemination, or depth.
- The authors call for careful terminology in clinical communication, antimicrobial stewardship, and manuscript peer review.
Related Resources & Content
Based on findings from:
Pleonasms in infectious diseases: more than just a superfluous misnomer?
Enrico Schalk. Infection, 2026.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s15010-026-03002-7
This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.