Quantitative ultrashort echo time (UTE) magnetic resonance imaging of femoral trabecular bone in aging and osteoporosis - Scorecard - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Quantitative Ultrashort Echo-Time MRI of Femoral Trabecular Bone in Aging and Osteoporosis

  • By

  • Jisook Yi

  • Arya Suprana

  • Yankai Meng

  • Yajun Ma

  • Eric Chang

  • Gina Woods

  • Charles Ginsberg

  • Saeed Jerban

  • Jiang Du

  • October 7, 2026

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Quantitative Ultrashort Echo-Time MRI of Femoral Trabecular Bone in Aging and Osteoporosis

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionClinical topic addressed by the source article: Quantitative Ultrashort Echo-Time MRI of Femoral Trabecular Bone in Aging and Osteoporosis
Key MechanismsMechanisms or clinical associations described in the source article.
Target PopulationPopulation described in the source article.
Care SettingSingle-center prospective research study using 3-T hip MRI; DXA-based classification was performed in participants aged 55 years or older.

Key Highlights

  • The study evaluated quantitative 3D UTE-MRI of proximal femoral trabecular bone, a less-studied application of UTE-MRI.
  • UTE-MRI is radiation-free and can acquire signal from trabecular bone, unlike conventional MRI, according to the article introduction.
  • The final cohort included 92 women aged 20–83 years, classified into four groups using age, clinical context, and, for older participants, DXA T-scores.
  • The supplied article text describes study methods but does not provide results or clinical recommendations.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Study classification used the lower femoral or lumbar-spine T-score: normal ≥ −1, osteopenia > −2.5 to < −1, and osteoporosis ≤ −2.5. Young Normal participants were under 40 years, had no clinical risk factors, and were classified without DXA.
  • These are study group definitions, not guideline recommendations.

Management

  • No management recommendations are reported in the supplied article text.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • No monitoring recommendations are reported in the supplied article text.

Risks

  • The article states that DXA provides areal BMD and does not directly visualize three-dimensional trabecular architecture.
  • The article states that QCT provides volumetric BMD, involves ionizing radiation, and does not directly characterize marrow water and fat.
  • The article describes high-resolution UTE-MRI of trabecular bone as technically limited by patient-motion sensitivity and restricted field of view.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Prospective single-center cohort of adult female volunteers; 92 participants were included in the final analysis (mean age 57.9 years, range 20–83).

No treatment interventions or prescribing recommendations are reported in the supplied article text.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Study methods: DXA was performed in participants aged 55 years or older; group assignment used age, clinical context, and T-scores as applicable.
  • Study methods: Hip MRI was performed supine on a 3-T scanner using PD-UTE and STAIR-UTE protocols.
  • Study exclusions: images with incomplete femoral-head coverage, measurement-compromising artifacts, or missing imaging data were excluded.

Related Resources & Content

Original Source(s)

Related Content