Liver PDFF estimation using a multi-decoder water-fat separation neural network with a reduced number of echoes - Scorecard - MDSpire

Liver PDFF estimation using a multi-decoder water-fat separation neural network with a reduced number of echoes

  • By

  • Juan Pablo Meneses

  • Cristobal Arrieta

  • Gabriel della Maggiora

  • Cecilia Besa

  • Jesús Urbina

  • Marco Arrese

  • Juan Cristóbal Gana

  • Jose E. Galgani

  • Cristian Tejos

  • Sergio Uribe

  • April 4, 2023

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Estimation of Liver Proton Density Fat Fraction Using a Multi-Decoder Neural Network for Water-Fat Separation with Fewer Echoes

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionNon-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)
Key MechanismsEstimation of liver proton density fat fraction (PDFF) via chemical shift-encoded MRI addressing water-fat separation and confounding factors (R2*, off-resonance field, multi-peak fat spectrum)
Target PopulationPatients with suspected or confirmed hepatic steatosis including healthy and fatty-liver subjects
Care SettingRadiology and imaging centers performing liver MRI for NAFLD assessment

Key Highlights

  • NAFLD diagnosis and grading rely on accurate PDFF estimation, traditionally requiring 6-echo MRI acquisitions.
  • Graph cut-based water-fat separation is gold standard but computationally intensive and requires longer scan times with multiple breath-holds.
  • The proposed multi-decoder U-Net neural network (MDWF-Net) enables accurate PDFF estimation using only 3-echo MRI acquisitions, reducing scan time and breath-hold requirements.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use chemical shift-encoded MRI to non-invasively estimate liver PDFF for NAFLD assessment.
  • Acquire multi-echo gradient echo sequences with at least 6 echoes for standard R2* and off-resonance correction.
  • Consider reduced echo acquisitions with advanced neural network methods to shorten scan time.

Management

  • Optimize MRI pulse sequence parameters (e.g., TR, flip angle) to minimize T1 bias and maximize slice coverage per breath-hold.
  • Apply multi-task deep learning models to jointly estimate water-only, fat-only images, R2*, and off-resonance maps.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Monitor PDFF changes longitudinally using consistent MRI protocols and validated water-fat separation techniques.
  • Validate reduced echo protocols against standard 6-echo methods to ensure accuracy.

Risks

  • Long scan times and multiple breath-holds may reduce patient compliance and image quality.
  • Shortening repetition time (TR) can introduce T1-weighting bias if flip angles are not appropriately low.

Patient & Prescribing Data

134 volunteers including healthy and fatty-liver subjects; additional healthy subjects scanned prospectively

MDWF-Net enables accurate liver PDFF quantification with 3-echo MRI, reducing scan time from 120 to 54 seconds and breath-hold demands without compromising accuracy compared to 6-echo graph cut method.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Exclude confounding liver conditions and significant alcohol use when assessing NAFLD via MRI.
  • Use low flip angles during MRI acquisition to reduce T1 bias when shortening TR.
  • Employ multi-task neural networks to improve water-fat separation and confounder estimation from fewer echoes.
  • Validate new imaging protocols against established reference methods before clinical adoption.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content