Retrospective evaluation of interval breast cancer screening mammograms by radiologists and AI - Scorecard - MDSpire

Retrospective evaluation of interval breast cancer screening mammograms by radiologists and AI

  • By

  • Jonas Subelack

  • Rudolf Morant

  • Marcel Blum

  • Axel Gräwingholt

  • Justus Vogel

  • Alexander Geissler

  • David Ehlig

  • August 4, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Assessment of Interval Breast Cancer Screening Mammograms Utilizing Radiologists and Artificial Intelligence: A Retrospective Study

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionInterval Breast Cancer (IBC) detected within mammography screening intervals
Key MechanismsEarly detection via mammography screening programs (MSP), radiologist interpretation, and AI-based mammogram analysis
Target PopulationWomen aged 50-69 participating in Swiss mammography screening programs
Care SettingPopulation-based mammography screening programs in Swiss cantons

Key Highlights

  • Interval breast cancers (IBC) occur within screening intervals and are associated with more aggressive tumors and higher mortality.
  • AI systems like ProFound AI® can analyze mammograms to identify signs of breast cancer potentially missed by radiologists.
  • Reducing IBC incidence is a key quality indicator for mammography screening programs and may be improved by AI without increasing workload.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Classify breast cancer as interval cancer if diagnosed within 24 months after a normal screening mammogram.
  • Use double reading by experienced radiologists to evaluate screening mammograms.
  • Consider AI systems to retrospectively identify signs of breast cancer in interval cancer mammograms.

Management

  • Invite women aged 50-69 to biennial mammography screening covered by compulsory health insurance with minimal co-payment.
  • Exclude benign conditions such as LCIS from invasive breast cancer analyses and management.
  • Consider shortening screening intervals or additional imaging modalities (e.g., MRI) for women at higher risk, balancing cost and burden.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Use the rate of interval breast cancers as a key quality indicator of mammography screening program effectiveness.
  • Monitor AI system performance using case scores and risk scores to assess breast cancer likelihood and forecast risk.
  • Maintain cancer registries to track diagnosis, staging, treatment, and outcomes for continuous quality assessment.

Risks

  • Interval breast cancers may be missed due to dense breast tissue, slow tumor development, or radiologist perceptual/interpretation errors.
  • Increasing screening frequency or imaging modalities may increase workload, costs, and patient burden.
  • AI integration into routine screening workflows requires consistent evidence of performance, especially in detecting interval cancers.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Women aged 50-69 participating in Swiss mammography screening programs with identified interval breast cancers

Interval breast cancers are associated with more aggressive tumor characteristics and higher rates of invasive treatments compared to screen-detected cancers.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Implement double reading of mammograms by experienced radiologists to improve detection accuracy.
  • Utilize AI systems like ProFound AI® to support radiologists in identifying subtle signs of breast cancer in screening mammograms.
  • Exclude benign lesions such as LCIS from breast cancer diagnosis and management protocols.
  • Maintain comprehensive cancer registries for accurate tracking of screening outcomes and interval cancer incidence.
  • Consider risk stratification using AI-derived risk scores to tailor screening intervals and modalities.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content