Racial/ethnic and geographic differences in second primary cancers in stomach cancer survivors: a comparative study of U.S. and South Korea - Scorecard - MDSpire
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more
Advertisement
Geographic and Racial/Ethnic Variations in Second Primary Cancers Among Survivors of Stomach Cancer: A Comparative Analysis Between the United States and South Korea
Clinical Scorecard: Geographic and Racial/Ethnic Variations in Second Primary Cancers Among Survivors of Stomach Cancer: A Comparative Analysis Between the United States and South Korea
At a Glance
Category
Detail
Condition
Second primary cancers (SPCs) in stomach cancer survivors
Key Mechanisms
Increased SPC risk following improved stomach cancer survival; racial/ethnic and geographic differences in SPC incidence and outcomes
Target Population
Stomach cancer survivors in the United States and South Korea, including disaggregated Asian subgroups
Care Setting
Population-based cancer registries and survivorship care
Key Highlights
Stomach cancer survival has improved significantly in the U.S. and South Korea, increasing SPC risk among survivors.
SPC incidence varies by race/ethnicity and geography, with highest SPC proportions in White and Korean American patients in the U.S., and a lower proportion in South Korea.
Disaggregated Asian subgroups reveal important differences in SPC risk and survival outcomes, underscoring the need for detailed racial/ethnic stratification.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
Define SPCs as non-stomach malignancies diagnosed at least 12 months after initial stomach cancer diagnosis to minimize misclassification.
Exclude non-melanoma and basal cell skin cancers from SPC consideration due to low lethality.
Management
Consider racial/ethnic and geographic variations when planning survivorship care and SPC surveillance.
Account for initial cancer treatment factors, such as radiotherapy, which may influence SPC risk.
Monitoring & Follow-up
Use cumulative incidence estimation methods (e.g., Aalen-Johansen estimator) accounting for competing mortality risks in SPC surveillance.
Monitor survival outcomes post-SPC development using time-varying covariate models to avoid immortal time bias.
Risks
Recognize that SPC risk is influenced by race/ethnicity, geographic location, tumor characteristics, and treatment modalities.
High competing mortality in distant-stage stomach cancer patients limits SPC risk assessment; focus on localized and regional stages.
Patient & Prescribing Data
Stomach cancer survivors in the U.S. SEER-17 registries and South Korea CPLD database, excluding distant-stage and short-term survivors
Radiotherapy for initial stomach cancer may increase SPC risk; survival impact of SPC varies by race/ethnicity and Asian subgroups.
Clinical Best Practices
Apply consistent inclusion/exclusion criteria across populations for SPC risk assessment to ensure comparability.
Disaggregate Asian subgroups in clinical data to identify subgroup-specific SPC risks and outcomes.
Incorporate competing risk methods in SPC incidence estimation to accurately reflect survivor risk.
Adjust survival analyses for key prognostic factors and model SPC as a time-varying covariate to prevent bias.
Explore individual- and system-level factors underlying racial/ethnic and geographic disparities in SPC incidence and survival.
Robot-assisted surgery (RAS) has led to shorter hospital stays, faster recovery and reduced pain for patients with many types of cancer. Now, thanks to the pioneering work of Moshim Kukar, MD, FACS, Department of Surgical Oncology, and his Roswell Park team, RAS is the standard of care for eligible patients with gastroesophageal junction cancers.