Racial/ethnic and geographic differences in second primary cancers in stomach cancer survivors: a comparative study of U.S. and South Korea - Scorecard - MDSpire
Advertisement
Racial/ethnic and geographic differences in second primary cancers in stomach cancer survivors: a comparative study of U.S. and South Korea
Clinical Scorecard: Geographic and Racial/Ethnic Variations in Second Primary Cancers Among Survivors of Stomach Cancer: A Comparative Analysis Between the United States and South Korea
At a Glance
Category
Detail
Condition
Second primary cancers (SPCs) in stomach cancer survivors
Key Mechanisms
Increased SPC risk following improved stomach cancer survival; racial/ethnic and geographic differences in SPC incidence and outcomes
Target Population
Stomach cancer survivors in the United States and South Korea, including disaggregated Asian subgroups
Care Setting
Population-based cancer registries and survivorship care
Key Highlights
Stomach cancer survival has improved significantly in the U.S. and South Korea, increasing SPC risk among survivors.
SPC incidence varies by race/ethnicity and geography, with highest SPC proportions in White and Korean American patients in the U.S., and a lower proportion in South Korea.
Disaggregated Asian subgroups reveal important differences in SPC risk and survival outcomes, underscoring the need for detailed racial/ethnic stratification.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
Define SPCs as non-stomach malignancies diagnosed at least 12 months after initial stomach cancer diagnosis to minimize misclassification.
Exclude non-melanoma and basal cell skin cancers from SPC consideration due to low lethality.
Management
Consider racial/ethnic and geographic variations when planning survivorship care and SPC surveillance.
Account for initial cancer treatment factors, such as radiotherapy, which may influence SPC risk.
Monitoring & Follow-up
Use cumulative incidence estimation methods (e.g., Aalen-Johansen estimator) accounting for competing mortality risks in SPC surveillance.
Monitor survival outcomes post-SPC development using time-varying covariate models to avoid immortal time bias.
Risks
Recognize that SPC risk is influenced by race/ethnicity, geographic location, tumor characteristics, and treatment modalities.
High competing mortality in distant-stage stomach cancer patients limits SPC risk assessment; focus on localized and regional stages.
Patient & Prescribing Data
Stomach cancer survivors in the U.S. SEER-17 registries and South Korea CPLD database, excluding distant-stage and short-term survivors
Radiotherapy for initial stomach cancer may increase SPC risk; survival impact of SPC varies by race/ethnicity and Asian subgroups.
Clinical Best Practices
Apply consistent inclusion/exclusion criteria across populations for SPC risk assessment to ensure comparability.
Disaggregate Asian subgroups in clinical data to identify subgroup-specific SPC risks and outcomes.
Incorporate competing risk methods in SPC incidence estimation to accurately reflect survivor risk.
Adjust survival analyses for key prognostic factors and model SPC as a time-varying covariate to prevent bias.
Explore individual- and system-level factors underlying racial/ethnic and geographic disparities in SPC incidence and survival.