Racial/ethnic and geographic differences in second primary cancers in stomach cancer survivors: a comparative study of U.S. and South Korea - Scorecard - MDSpire

Racial/ethnic and geographic differences in second primary cancers in stomach cancer survivors: a comparative study of U.S. and South Korea

  • By

  • Wang, Yuntong

  • Choi, Dong-Woo

  • Lee, Sangwon

  • Mao, Jialin

  • Sedrakyan, Art

  • Shu, Xiang

  • Choi, Kui Son

  • Chae, Heejung

  • Choi, Eunji

  • March 9, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Geographic and Racial/Ethnic Variations in Second Primary Cancers Among Survivors of Stomach Cancer: A Comparative Analysis Between the United States and South Korea

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionSecond primary cancers (SPCs) in stomach cancer survivors
Key MechanismsIncreased SPC risk following improved stomach cancer survival; racial/ethnic and geographic differences in SPC incidence and outcomes
Target PopulationStomach cancer survivors in the United States and South Korea, including disaggregated Asian subgroups
Care SettingPopulation-based cancer registries and survivorship care

Key Highlights

  • Stomach cancer survival has improved significantly in the U.S. and South Korea, increasing SPC risk among survivors.
  • SPC incidence varies by race/ethnicity and geography, with highest SPC proportions in White and Korean American patients in the U.S., and a lower proportion in South Korea.
  • Disaggregated Asian subgroups reveal important differences in SPC risk and survival outcomes, underscoring the need for detailed racial/ethnic stratification.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Define SPCs as non-stomach malignancies diagnosed at least 12 months after initial stomach cancer diagnosis to minimize misclassification.
  • Exclude non-melanoma and basal cell skin cancers from SPC consideration due to low lethality.

Management

  • Consider racial/ethnic and geographic variations when planning survivorship care and SPC surveillance.
  • Account for initial cancer treatment factors, such as radiotherapy, which may influence SPC risk.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Use cumulative incidence estimation methods (e.g., Aalen-Johansen estimator) accounting for competing mortality risks in SPC surveillance.
  • Monitor survival outcomes post-SPC development using time-varying covariate models to avoid immortal time bias.

Risks

  • Recognize that SPC risk is influenced by race/ethnicity, geographic location, tumor characteristics, and treatment modalities.
  • High competing mortality in distant-stage stomach cancer patients limits SPC risk assessment; focus on localized and regional stages.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Stomach cancer survivors in the U.S. SEER-17 registries and South Korea CPLD database, excluding distant-stage and short-term survivors

Radiotherapy for initial stomach cancer may increase SPC risk; survival impact of SPC varies by race/ethnicity and Asian subgroups.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Apply consistent inclusion/exclusion criteria across populations for SPC risk assessment to ensure comparability.
  • Disaggregate Asian subgroups in clinical data to identify subgroup-specific SPC risks and outcomes.
  • Incorporate competing risk methods in SPC incidence estimation to accurately reflect survivor risk.
  • Adjust survival analyses for key prognostic factors and model SPC as a time-varying covariate to prevent bias.
  • Explore individual- and system-level factors underlying racial/ethnic and geographic disparities in SPC incidence and survival.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content