Comparison of outcome for holmium laser enucleation prostate and Rezum system in benign prostate hyperplasia: a matched pair analysis - Scorecard - MDSpire

Comparison of outcome for holmium laser enucleation prostate and Rezum system in benign prostate hyperplasia: a matched pair analysis

  • By

  • Orkunt Özkaptan

  • Cüneyd Sevinç

  • Cengiz Çanakcı

  • Tahsin Batuhan Aydoğan

  • Oğuz Türkyılmaz

  • Mahmut Selman Mert

  • Alkan Çubuk

  • April 22, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Evaluation of Outcomes for Holmium Laser Enucleation versus Rezum System in Treating Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Matched Pair Study

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionBenign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) causing lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)
Key MechanismsHoLEP uses holmium laser to enucleate prostate tissue; Rezum delivers thermal energy via water vapour causing targeted cell necrosis
Target PopulationMales aged 50–80 years with prostate volumes 50–150 mL, symptomatic BPH unresponsive to alpha-blockers
Care SettingTertiary care centre surgical setting with experienced surgeons

Key Highlights

  • HoLEP is size-independent, effective with less blood loss and considered gold standard for BPH surgery
  • Rezum is minimally invasive, preserves antegrade ejaculation, recommended for prostate <80 g and sexual function preservation
  • This study compares efficacy and safety of Rezum versus HoLEP in prostates >50 g including larger glands

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Assess prostate volume via transrectal ultrasound
  • Evaluate symptoms using IPSS and Qmax measurements
  • Exclude patients with urethral stricture, bladder stones, neurogenic bladder, high PVR, or coagulopathy

Management

  • Initial treatment with behavioural and medicinal interventions (alpha-blockers)
  • Surgical intervention (HoLEP or Rezum) if medical treatment fails
  • HoLEP preferred for size-independent treatment; Rezum recommended for prostate <80 g and sexual function preservation

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Follow-up at 6 and 12 months with Qmax, PVR, IPSS, PGI-I, and IIEF-5 assessments
  • Monitor for complications such as urine retention, haematuria, incontinence, UTI, and epididymitis

Risks

  • HoLEP associated with high rates (65–90%) of retrograde ejaculation
  • Potential perioperative morbidity including bleeding and catheterization duration
  • Rezum may have fewer sexual side effects but long-term efficacy in larger prostates requires further evaluation

Patient & Prescribing Data

Patients aged 50–80 years with symptomatic BPH, prostate volume 50–150 mL, refractory to alpha-blockers

Rezum performed under local anesthesia with sedation as day case; HoLEP under spinal anesthesia with hospitalization; choice influenced by prostate size and sexual function considerations

Clinical Best Practices

  • Perform thorough preoperative evaluation including symptom scores, uroflowmetry, and imaging
  • Select surgical modality based on prostate size, patient preference, and sexual function goals
  • Ensure experienced surgeons perform procedures to optimize outcomes
  • Use prophylactic antibiotics and appropriate anesthesia protocols
  • Monitor patients closely postoperatively for complications and functional improvements

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content