Impact of center volume on outcomes in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for children - Scorecard - MDSpire

Impact of center volume on outcomes in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for children

  • By

  • Motohiro Kato

  • Hideki Nakashone

  • Keitaro Matsuo

  • Yuri Ito

  • Atsumi Yanagisawa

  • Marie Ohbiki

  • Ken Tabuchi

  • Tatsuo Ichinohe

  • Yoshiko Hashii

  • Junya Kanda

  • Hideki Goto

  • Koji Kato

  • Makoto Yoshimitsu

  • Atsushi Sato

  • Moeko Hino

  • Kimikazu Matsumoto

  • Kimikazu Yakushijin

  • Yoshiko Atsuta

  • Takahiro Fukuda

  • April 10, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: The Influence of Transplant Center Volume on Pediatric Outcomes in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionPediatric patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for malignant and non-malignant diseases
Key MechanismsCenter volume effect on transplant outcomes potentially mediated by institutional experience, conditioning regimens, immunosuppression, and supportive care practices
Target PopulationPediatric patients aged 19 years or younger receiving first allogeneic HCT
Care SettingPediatric transplant centers categorized by allogeneic HCT volume over 20 years

Key Highlights

  • No statistically significant difference in 5-year overall survival (OS) across transplant center volume categories (low to high volume centers).
  • High-volume centers had a higher proportion of non-malignant disease transplants, fewer umbilical cord blood transplants, and more non-myeloablative conditioning.
  • Previous studies on center volume effects in pediatric HCT are limited and findings are inconsistent, highlighting the need for pediatric-specific analyses.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Include pediatric patients aged ≤19 years undergoing first allogeneic HCT for malignant or non-malignant diseases.
  • Exclude patients from mixed pediatric-adult teams and those receiving allogeneic transplants for solid tumors.

Management

  • Optimize conditioning regimens and donor matching tailored to patient disease and center experience.
  • Implement supportive care protocols to manage post-transplant immune responses and complications.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Use Kaplan-Meier and cumulative incidence methods to monitor overall survival, relapse, and non-relapse mortality.
  • Perform multivariate Cox regression analyses to adjust for confounding factors in outcome assessment.

Risks

  • Recognize that factors such as disease type and residual tumor burden impact outcomes beyond center control.
  • Consider that high-volume centers may treat more complex or higher-risk patients, potentially influencing outcomes.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Pediatric patients undergoing first allogeneic HCT at pediatric centers in Japan from 2001 to 2020

Center volume did not significantly affect 5-year overall survival; treatment approaches varied with center volume, including conditioning intensity and graft source selection.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Classify transplant centers by cumulative allogeneic HCT volume to evaluate institutional experience.
  • Tailor conditioning regimens and supportive care based on center expertise and patient disease characteristics.
  • Utilize nationwide registry data for comprehensive outcome analysis and quality improvement.
  • Ensure ethical compliance and informed consent for use of clinical data in research.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content