The Third Reader
If the pathology report is our work, then making sure the patient can understand what we have said is part of our work as well
-
By
-
Kamran Mirza
-
September 8, 2026
-
Clinical Scorecard: The Third Reader
At a Glance
| Category | Detail |
| Condition | Pathology Reporting and Patient Communication |
| Key Mechanisms | Impact of health literacy and AI on understanding pathology reports |
| Target Population | Patients receiving cancer diagnoses |
| Care Setting | Clinical pathology and oncology |
Key Highlights
- 39% of patients understood standard pathology reports correctly compared to 93% for patient-centered versions.
- Patients increasingly access their reports before discussing with clinicians, leading to misunderstandings.
- AI tools are being used by patients to interpret complex medical information.
- Simplified reports improved comprehension significantly but still contained errors.
- Organizations are developing AI solutions to aid in patient understanding of medical reports.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
- Patients should receive their cancer diagnosis from a clinician whenever possible.
Management
- Incorporate AI tools into clinician workflows to provide plain-language interpretations of reports.
Monitoring & Follow-up
- Monitor patient understanding and satisfaction with report communication methods.
Risks
- Patients may misinterpret information from AI tools without clinician oversight.
Patient & Prescribing Data
Individuals diagnosed with cancer accessing pathology reports
Patients prefer clinician communication but value direct access to their medical information.
Clinical Best Practices
- Ensure pathology reports are understandable to patients.
- Utilize AI to enhance readability while maintaining clinician oversight.
- Provide training for clinicians on effective communication of complex medical information.
Related Resources & Content