Effect of Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG) Supplementation on infection-free survival in recipients of BCMA-directed bispecific antibody therapy for multiple myeloma - Scorecard - MDSpire

Effect of Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG) Supplementation on infection-free survival in recipients of BCMA-directed bispecific antibody therapy for multiple myeloma

  • By

  • Meera Mohan

  • Aniko Szabo

  • Heloise Cheruvalath

  • Anna Clennon

  • Vineel Bhatlapenumarthi

  • Anannya Patwari

  • Metodi Balev

  • Divaya Bhutani

  • Asis Shrestha

  • Sharmilan Thanendrarajan

  • Binod Dhakal

  • Maurizio Zangari

  • Anup Trikannad

  • Sruthi Vellanki

  • Samer Al-Hadidi

  • Suzanne Lentzsch

  • Frits van Rhee

  • Aishee Bag

  • Anita D’Souza

  • Nishi Shah

  • Rajshekhar Chakraborty

  • Mansi R. Shah

  • Carolina Schinke

  • April 23, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Impact of Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG) Therapy on Infection-Free Survival in Patients Undergoing BCMA-Targeted Bispecific Antibody Treatment for Multiple Myeloma

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionRelapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma treated with BCMA-targeted bispecific antibodies
Key MechanismsProfound humoral immunodeficiency due to B cell depletion, neutropenia, T and B-cell depletion, immune effector cell exhaustion leading to increased infection risk
Target PopulationPatients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma receiving BCMA-targeted bispecific antibody therapy
Care SettingAcademic medical centers providing standard of care or investigational BCMA bsAb therapies

Key Highlights

  • BCMA-targeted bispecific antibodies show high efficacy but increase risk of serious infections and infection-related mortality.
  • Primary IVIG prophylaxis is variably recommended; evidence for its effectiveness in this setting is limited and conflicting.
  • This multi-institutional retrospective study evaluated infection outcomes in 225 patients receiving BCMA bsAb, comparing primary IVIG prophylaxis versus no primary IVIG.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Assess infection risk based on history of infections, baseline blood counts, inflammatory markers, and combination therapies.
  • Monitor for hypogammaglobulinemia in patients receiving BCMA-targeted therapies.

Management

  • Consider IVIG replacement therapy either as primary prophylaxis (before infection) or secondary prophylaxis (after infection) based on institutional guidelines.
  • Implement infection prophylaxis measures tailored to patient risk factors and therapy type.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Regularly monitor for infections using clinical, imaging, microbiological, and histopathological assessments.
  • Grade infections using CTCAE v5 criteria and monitor for CRS and ICANS per established consensus guidelines.

Risks

  • Heightened infection risk due to profound immunodeficiency from BCMA bsAb therapy.
  • Potential for infection-related morbidity and mortality despite IVIG prophylaxis.

Patient & Prescribing Data

225 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma treated with BCMA-targeted bispecific antibodies across five US academic centers.

41% received primary IVIG prophylaxis after bsAb initiation but before infection; 59% did not receive primary IVIG. Patients receiving non-BCMA bsAb were excluded due to lower infection risk.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Define primary IVIG prophylaxis as administration after bsAb start but before any documented infection.
  • Exclude patients receiving IVIG before bsAb therapy from primary prophylaxis analyses.
  • Use landmark and time-dependent statistical analyses to adjust for immortal-time bias in evaluating IVIG effectiveness.
  • Tailor infection prophylaxis strategies based on individual patient risk factors and evolving clinical evidence.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content