Comparing different modalities for the diagnosis of incisional hernia: a systematic review - Scorecard - MDSpire

Comparing different modalities for the diagnosis of incisional hernia: a systematic review

  • By

  • L. F. Kroese

  • D. Sneiders

  • G. J. Kleinrensink

  • F. Muysoms

  • J. F. Lange

  • January 11, 2018

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Evaluating Various Diagnostic Approaches for Incisional Hernia: A Systematic Review

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionIncisional hernia (IH) following open abdominal surgery
Key MechanismsAbdominal wall gap or fascial defect at postoperative scar site, with or without bulge
Target PopulationPatients undergoing open abdominal or incisional hernia repair surgery
Care SettingSurgical and postoperative follow-up settings, including research and clinical practice

Key Highlights

  • IH prevalence varies widely (10-32%) influenced by factors like age, obesity, and prior surgery.
  • Diagnostic modalities include physical exam, ultrasound, CT-scan, MRI, and per-operative diagnosis.
  • Use of imaging (ultrasound or CT) is recommended in research for reliable IH detection but differs from routine clinical practice.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use ultrasound or CT-scan in follow-up of prospective IH studies as per European Hernia Society guidelines.
  • Physical examination remains primary in clinical practice focusing on symptomatic IH requiring treatment.
  • Definition of IH includes any abdominal wall gap with or without bulge detectable by clinical exam or imaging.

Management

  • Treatment decisions generally based on symptomatic IH diagnosis.
  • Imaging reserved for inconclusive physical exams or research confirmation.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Follow-up protocols vary; imaging modalities improve detection reliability in research settings.
  • Diagnostic protocols differ in use of imaging and clinical examination.

Risks

  • Variability in IH detection rates due to differences in diagnostic modality, observer, and definition.
  • Potential bias in studies due to inconsistent diagnostic criteria and protocols.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Patients post open abdominal or IH repair surgery monitored for IH development

Diagnostic accuracy varies by modality; imaging may increase detection but evidence is limited and sometimes contradictory

Clinical Best Practices

  • Standardize IH definition and diagnostic protocols to improve comparability across studies.
  • Incorporate imaging modalities, especially ultrasound or CT, in research follow-up to enhance detection accuracy.
  • Use physical examination as initial diagnostic tool in clinical practice, reserving imaging for unclear cases.
  • Consider patient factors (e.g., obesity) that may affect diagnostic performance of modalities.
  • Assess inter-observer variability and ensure training to improve diagnostic reliability.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content