Comparing different modalities for the diagnosis of incisional hernia: a systematic review
-
By
-
L. F. Kroese
-
D. Sneiders
-
G. J. Kleinrensink
-
F. Muysoms
-
J. F. Lange
-
January 11, 2018
-
Clinical Scorecard: Evaluating Various Diagnostic Approaches for Incisional Hernia: A Systematic Review
At a Glance
| Category | Detail |
| Condition | Incisional hernia (IH) following open abdominal surgery |
| Key Mechanisms | Abdominal wall gap or fascial defect at postoperative scar site, with or without bulge |
| Target Population | Patients undergoing open abdominal or incisional hernia repair surgery |
| Care Setting | Surgical and postoperative follow-up settings, including research and clinical practice |
Key Highlights
- IH prevalence varies widely (10-32%) influenced by factors like age, obesity, and prior surgery.
- Diagnostic modalities include physical exam, ultrasound, CT-scan, MRI, and per-operative diagnosis.
- Use of imaging (ultrasound or CT) is recommended in research for reliable IH detection but differs from routine clinical practice.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
- Use ultrasound or CT-scan in follow-up of prospective IH studies as per European Hernia Society guidelines.
- Physical examination remains primary in clinical practice focusing on symptomatic IH requiring treatment.
- Definition of IH includes any abdominal wall gap with or without bulge detectable by clinical exam or imaging.
Management
- Treatment decisions generally based on symptomatic IH diagnosis.
- Imaging reserved for inconclusive physical exams or research confirmation.
Monitoring & Follow-up
- Follow-up protocols vary; imaging modalities improve detection reliability in research settings.
- Diagnostic protocols differ in use of imaging and clinical examination.
Risks
- Variability in IH detection rates due to differences in diagnostic modality, observer, and definition.
- Potential bias in studies due to inconsistent diagnostic criteria and protocols.
Patient & Prescribing Data
Patients post open abdominal or IH repair surgery monitored for IH development
Diagnostic accuracy varies by modality; imaging may increase detection but evidence is limited and sometimes contradictory
Clinical Best Practices
- Standardize IH definition and diagnostic protocols to improve comparability across studies.
- Incorporate imaging modalities, especially ultrasound or CT, in research follow-up to enhance detection accuracy.
- Use physical examination as initial diagnostic tool in clinical practice, reserving imaging for unclear cases.
- Consider patient factors (e.g., obesity) that may affect diagnostic performance of modalities.
- Assess inter-observer variability and ensure training to improve diagnostic reliability.
References