Assessing Primary Care’s Core Contributions: Continuity, Trust, and Stewardship
-
By
-
Mark D. Schwartz
-
October 13, 2026
Clinical Scorecard: Assessing Primary Care’s Core Contributions: Continuity, Trust, and Stewardship
At a Glance
| Category | Detail |
|---|---|
| Condition | Clinical topic addressed by the source article: Assessing Primary Care’s Core Contributions |
| Key Mechanisms | The proposed dashboard assesses access, continuity, trust, coordination, comprehensiveness, stewardship, and treatment burden as primary care functions. |
| Target Population | Patients receiving primary care; the article does not specify a disease-specific population. |
| Care Setting | Care setting described in the source article. |
Key Highlights
- Common measures such as visits, codes, screenings, and disease targets may miss important contributions of primary care.
- A proposed Primary Care Value Dashboard would assess whether care is accessible, relational, integrated, and effective in supporting people to live well over time.
- Continuity can persist across multiple clinicians when the patient’s history, goals, and care plan are recognized and integrated.
- Stewardship includes helping patients obtain necessary care while avoiding low-value tests, referrals, treatments, and burdens.
- The article recommends initially using patient-reported measures for learning and quality improvement rather than payment.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
Management
- Initially use patient-reported measures to support learning and quality improvement, identify barriers, redesign care, and understand patient experience.
- The article describes adaptable payment models as a way to finance care management, outreach, behavioral health integration, coordination, and access.
Monitoring & Follow-up
- Routinely assess patient-reported access, continuity, trust, coordination, and treatment burden.
- The article describes fragmented measurement efforts and calls for further work on applying measures to improve care, inform payment, and reinforce accountability.
Risks
- Visit-, code-, screening-, and disease-target-focused metrics may overlook primary care contributions outside appointments, including coordination and avoidance of unnecessary services.
- Fee-for-service inadequately rewards continuity, stewardship, and coordination, much of which occurs between visits or averts visits.
Patient & Prescribing Data
Patients receiving primary care; the article does not specify a disease-specific population.
The article discusses measurement of patient experience and care functions, not specific medications or prescribing regimens. Stewardship includes avoiding low-value medications and other treatment burdens.
Clinical Best Practices
- Assess access beyond appointment availability, including contact with the care team, prompt direction, and movement through services without avoidable obstacles or extended waits.
- Assess continuity across clinicians by whether the patient’s story, goals, and care plan remain familiar and integrated.
- Use treatment-burden instruments to quantify health care workload and its effects on patients’ lives.
- Consider patient-defined goals and quality of life alongside disease-specific targets when measuring primary care value.
- Initially use patient-reported measures for learning and quality improvement rather than payment.
Related Resources & Content
- 1. Barbara Starfield’s four Cs of primary care
- 2. National Academies characterization of primary care as a common good
- 3. Treatment burden instruments
- 4. Measures of continuity
- 5. Person-Centered Primary Care Measure
- 6. NCQA Person-Centered Outcome Measures
- 7. Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative
Based on findings from:
Measuring What Matters in Primary Care: Continuity, Trust, and Stewardship
Mark D. Schwartz. Journal Of General Internal Medicine, 2026.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11606-026-10936-z
This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.