Correction: Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach does not alter arterial clamping strategy during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: interim results from the multicentric PODRACING randomized controlled trial - Scorecard - MDSpire

Correction: Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach does not alter arterial clamping strategy during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: interim results from the multicentric PODRACING randomized controlled trial

  • By

  • Joris Vangeneugden

  • Saar Vermijs

  • Peter De Kuyper

  • Camille Berquin

  • Nicolaas Lumen

  • Victor Declerck

  • Frederic Baekelandt

  • Christophe Ghysel

  • Yannic Raskin

  • Bernard Bynens

  • Kenzo Mestdagh

  • Pieter De Backer

  • Pieter De Visschere

  • Charlotte Debbaut

  • Charles Van Praet

  • Karel Decaestecker

  • July 17, 2026

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Correction: The Approach of Transperitoneal versus Retroperitoneal Does Not Impact Arterial Clamping Techniques in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Interim Findings from the Multicenter PODRACING Randomized Controlled Trial

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionClinical topic addressed by the source article: Correction
Key MechanismsMechanisms or clinical associations described in the source article.
Target PopulationPatients or participants described in the source article.
Care SettingSpecify the nature of the multicenter trial.

Key Highlights

  • Remove 'Correction of conflict of interest statement.'

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

    Management

      Monitoring & Follow-up

        Risks

          Patient & Prescribing Data

          Patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

          No significant difference in arterial clamping techniques based on surgical approach.

          Clinical Best Practices

            Related Resources & Content

            Original Source(s)

            Related Content