Clinical Scorecard: Pre-Treatment Strategies Prior to CAR-T Administration for Multiple Myeloma: Insights from the CMWP and CTIWP of the EBMT
At a Glance
Category
Detail
Condition
Multiple Myeloma
Key Mechanisms
Bridging therapy to control disease and maintain performance status prior to anti-BCMA CAR-T infusion
Target Population
Multiple Myeloma patients eligible for anti-BCMA CAR-T therapy
Care Setting
Specialized centers administering CAR-T therapy, primarily in Europe
Key Highlights
Bridging therapy is used in >85% of MM patients awaiting CAR-T, with proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs as most common agents.
Bridging regimens are highly individualized, driven by prior therapy, refractory status, and disease burden, with limited protocol standardization.
Concerns exist regarding bispecific antibody wash-out timing, T-cell fitness preservation, and logistical challenges including manufacturing delays.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
Assess prior therapy and refractory patterns to guide bridging regimen selection.
Use serum free light chains and M-protein levels predominantly for disease monitoring during bridging.
Employ imaging (PET/CT or MRI) and clinical symptom assessment to evaluate disease status.
Management
Initiate bridging therapy promptly within one week after apheresis, typically lasting 1–2 months.
Select bridging regimens based on prior treatments, disease burden, and extramedullary involvement.
Use proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, chemotherapy, monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibodies, or radiation as bridging options.
Avoid bendamustine pre-apheresis; exercise caution with bispecific antibodies and apply short wash-out periods (2–4 weeks) before apheresis.
Proceed to CAR-T infusion even after progression on bridging therapy in most cases.
Monitoring & Follow-up
Monitor serum markers (free light chains, M-protein) frequently during bridging.
Use imaging modalities regularly to assess response.
Evaluate clinical symptoms and consider bone marrow assessment selectively.
Make treatment decisions based on serum marker reductions, progression signals, toxicity, and imaging improvements.
Risks
Potential lymphocyte exhaustion and toxicity from bridging regimens, especially bispecific antibodies.
Interference with CAR-T target antigens by prior BCMA-targeting agents.
Logistical delays related to apheresis and manufacturing processes.
Limited evidence and lack of standardized protocols increase uncertainty in regimen selection and timing.
Patient & Prescribing Data
Multiple Myeloma patients undergoing bridging therapy prior to CAR-T infusion
Bridging therapy is widely used (>85% of patients) with proteasome inhibitors and IMiDs most common; bispecific antibodies are favored by experienced centers for superior efficacy but require careful wash-out management.
Clinical Best Practices
Prioritize prior therapy history and refractory status when selecting bridging regimens.
Initiate bridging therapy promptly after apheresis to maintain disease control.
Use short wash-out periods for bispecific antibodies before apheresis to minimize impact on T-cell fitness.
Continue to CAR-T infusion despite progression on bridging therapy unless toxicity or timing concerns arise.
Monitor disease status with serum markers and imaging to guide treatment adjustments.
Avoid bendamustine before apheresis due to contraindications.
Advocate for standardized protocols and further research to optimize bridging strategies.
by Nico Gagelmann, Maximilian Merz, Laurien G. A. Baaij, Linda Koster, Jorinde D. Hoogenboom, Joanna Drozd-Sokolowska, Kavita Raj, Jürgen Kuball, Patrick J. Hayden, Florent Malard, Laurent Garderet, Annalisa Ruggeri, Donal McLornan