A Two-Phase Deep Learning Approach for Detecting Laterally Spreading Tumors Utilizing Self-Supervised Learning and Few-Shot Classification Techniques - Scorecard - MDSpire

A Two-Phase Deep Learning Approach for Detecting Laterally Spreading Tumors Utilizing Self-Supervised Learning and Few-Shot Classification Techniques

  • By

  • Menghui Wang

  • Zhanpeng Shi

  • Yiwen Wang

  • Jie Lu

  • March 1, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: A Two-Phase Deep Learning Approach for Detecting Laterally Spreading Tumors Utilizing Self-Supervised Learning and Few-Shot Classification Techniques

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionLaterally spreading tumors (LSTs), precursor lesions of colorectal cancer
Key MechanismsTwo-stage AI framework using DINO-based self-supervised pretraining and Prototypical Networks for few-shot classification
Target PopulationPatients undergoing colonoscopy, aged ≥18 years
Care SettingColonoscopy and endoscopy clinical settings

Key Highlights

  • LSTs are lesions ≥10 mm growing horizontally along the intestinal wall with high malignant potential and difficult detection.
  • Proposed AI framework reduces reliance on large annotated datasets by leveraging self-supervised learning and few-shot classification.
  • Achieved clinically relevant detection performance using only 2799 labeled training images, validated with rigorous multi-expert annotation.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Diagnosis of LSTs currently relies on visual inspection by experienced endoscopists but is subject to false negatives.
  • Use internationally recognized diagnostic criteria for LSTs as per Kudo et al.
  • Employ multi-tier expert consensus annotation for accurate LST classification.

Management

  • Early detection of LSTs is critical to reduce progression to high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and colorectal cancer.
  • Integrate AI-assisted detection tools to support endoscopists and improve diagnostic accuracy.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Maintain quality control of colonoscopy images with adequate bowel preparation and image clarity.
  • Use stratified dataset splits and cross-validation to monitor AI model performance and generalizability.

Risks

  • False negatives due to operator experience and visual fatigue in manual detection.
  • Potential overfitting and suboptimal performance of AI models trained on limited labeled data without self-supervised pretraining.

Patient & Prescribing Data

12,376 colonoscopy cases with 3.02% diagnosed with LSTs, ages 15–94 years

AI model trained on 2799 labeled images with additional 150,168 unlabeled images for pretraining; balanced datasets used to improve detection accuracy.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Ensure high-quality colonoscopy images with adequate bowel preparation (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale ≥6) and proper illumination.
  • Adopt rigorous multi-expert annotation protocols for dataset labeling to establish reliable ground truth.
  • Utilize self-supervised learning on large unlabeled datasets to mitigate data scarcity in rare lesion detection.
  • Apply few-shot classification techniques to enable effective learning from limited labeled examples.
  • Validate AI models with held-out test sets and cross-validation to ensure robustness and clinical applicability.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content