Practical considerations for the use of IL-23p19 inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease: how to choose between them and why it matters? - Scorecard - MDSpire

Practical considerations for the use of IL-23p19 inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease: how to choose between them and why it matters?

  • By

  • Cecilia Lina Pugliano

  • Raymond Fueng-Hin Liang

  • Andrea Ruffa

  • Marietta Iacucci

  • Subrata Ghosh

  • August 1, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Key Factors in Selecting IL-23p19 Inhibitors for Treating Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Importance and Implications

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionModerate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis)
Key MechanismsSelective inhibition of the IL-23 p19 subunit to block pro-inflammatory cytokine signaling
Target PopulationPatients with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis, including those with concomitant IL-23 driven comorbidities
Care SettingGastroenterology clinical practice, infusion centers, outpatient settings

Key Highlights

  • Three anti-IL23p19 monoclonal antibodies (Risankizumab, Mirikizumab, Guselkumab) are approved for moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis.
  • Guselkumab uniquely offers subcutaneous induction dosing, improving patient adherence and reducing infusion-related risks.
  • Selection of anti-IL23p19 therapy should consider patient preference, IBD phenotype, extra-intestinal manifestations, concomitant immune diseases, and prior advanced therapy exposure.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Confirm moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis diagnosis before initiating anti-IL23p19 therapy.

Management

  • Initiate treatment with induction dosing (typically three IV doses at weeks 0, 4, and 8) followed by maintenance SC injections every 4–8 weeks depending on the agent and indication.
  • Consider Guselkumab for patients preferring subcutaneous induction to improve adherence and reduce infusion burden.
  • Personalize agent selection based on IBD phenotype, extra-intestinal manifestations, concomitant immune-mediated diseases, and prior therapy exposure.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Monitor clinical remission and endoscopic response at week 12 to assess treatment efficacy.
  • Observe for infusion-related reactions if IV induction is used.

Risks

  • Selective IL-23p19 inhibition may reduce susceptibility to some infections compared to IL-12/23 p40 blockade.
  • Long-term safety data and real-world effectiveness in complex phenotypes such as perianal fistulizing Crohn’s disease require further study.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Adults with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis, including those with IL-23 driven comorbidities like psoriasis.

Anti-IL23p19 agents demonstrate favorable efficacy and safety profiles; choice of agent and dosing regimen should be individualized to optimize adherence and outcomes.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Use shared decision-making to incorporate patient preferences regarding mode of administration (IV vs SC).
  • Tailor therapy choice to disease phenotype and presence of extra-intestinal or concomitant immune-mediated conditions.
  • Consider Guselkumab’s unique SC induction as a strategy to reduce infusion center burden and improve patient convenience.
  • Stay informed on emerging data regarding combination advanced therapies and their potential to improve long-term outcomes.
  • Encourage participation in real-world studies to better define effectiveness in complex IBD phenotypes.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content