Final analysis results from DREAMM-3, a phase 3 study of belantamab mafodotin versus pomalidomide plus dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma - Scorecard - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Final DREAMM-3 Phase 3 Findings: Belantamab Mafodotin Compared With Pomalidomide Plus Dexamethasone in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

  • By

  • Meletios Athanasios Dimopoulos

  • Vania Hungria

  • Haitao Meng

  • Atanas Radinoff

  • Jian Li

  • Sosana Delimpasi

  • Ting Niu

  • Gabor Mikala

  • Tamas Masszi

  • Marcelo Capra

  • Michael Low

  • Angelo Maiolino

  • Yan Xu

  • Xavier Leleu

  • Vasiliki Pappa

  • Dominik Chraniuk

  • Tatiana Konstantinova

  • Iurii Osipov

  • Shawn Hakim

  • Chris Brawley

  • Gabriela Tubel

  • Astrid McKeown

  • Julia Boyle

  • Sumita Roy-Ghanta

  • Katja Weisel

  • October 17, 2026

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Final DREAMM-3 Phase 3 Findings: Belantamab Mafodotin Compared With Pomalidomide Plus Dexamethasone in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionRelapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)
Key MechanismsBelantamab mafodotin is an anti-BCMA antibody-drug conjugate with a multimodal mechanism of action.
Target PopulationAdults with multiple myeloma verified using IMWG criteria and at least two prior lines of therapy, including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor.
Care SettingMulticenter, open-label phase 3 clinical trial comparing single-agent belantamab mafodotin with pomalidomide-dexamethasone.

Key Highlights

  • The final descriptive analysis included 325 randomized patients and had a median follow-up of approximately 22 months in each treatment group.
  • Median PFS was 11.2 months with belantamab mafodotin and 7.0 months with pomalidomide-dexamethasone; the HR was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.64–1.18).
  • Median OS was 24.0 versus 22.9 months, respectively; the HR was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.73–1.30).
  • Median duration of response was 25.3 months with belantamab mafodotin and 9.9 months with pomalidomide-dexamethasone.
  • Grade 3–4 adverse events occurred in 71% and 66% of patients, respectively; blurred vision was reported in 48% versus 7%.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Trial eligibility required multiple myeloma verified using International Myeloma Working Group criteria.

Management

  • Participants were randomized 2:1 to single-agent belantamab mafodotin or pomalidomide-dexamethasone and continued treatment until progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, loss to follow-up, or study completion.
  • Treatment-emergent adverse events with belantamab mafodotin were generally managed with dose delays and/or reductions.
  • Ophthalmic examination findings were managed with dose delays and dose reductions.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • The trial assessed investigator-assessed PFS using IMWG criteria, overall survival, response outcomes, adverse events, and ophthalmic examination findings.
  • Ophthalmic examination findings were graded by investigators or derived when investigator-assessed grades were unavailable.

Risks

  • At least one maximum Grade 3–4 adverse event occurred in 71% of belantamab mafodotin recipients and 66% of pomalidomide-dexamethasone recipients.
  • Blurred vision occurred in 48% with belantamab mafodotin and 7% with pomalidomide-dexamethasone.
  • Any-grade thrombocytopenia occurred in 35% and 34%, anemia in 29% and 34%, and neutropenia in 12% and 40%, respectively.

Patient & Prescribing Data

The final analysis included 325 patients: 218 assigned to belantamab mafodotin and 107 to pomalidomide-dexamethasone. Median age was 68 years; 22% were aged 75 years or older.

Median treatment duration was 4.5 months with belantamab mafodotin and 5.5 months with pomalidomide-dexamethasone. Among belantamab mafodotin recipients with available assessments, 80% of those with derived any-grade ophthalmic findings had Grade 2+ findings; 80% of patients with an initial Grade 2+ event had resolution to Grade 1 or better by data cutoff.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Assess ophthalmic examination findings during belantamab mafodotin treatment; the trial reports dose delays and reductions as management approaches.
  • Monitor adverse events, including ocular events, cytopenias, and reported liver enzyme or liver function abnormalities.
  • Interpret the final efficacy estimates as descriptive: no formal hypothesis testing was prespecified because the primary analysis had not met the superiority threshold.

Related Resources & Content

    Original Source(s)

    Related Content