Evaluation of virtual handles for dental implant manipulation in virtual reality implant planning procedure - Scorecard - MDSpire

Evaluation of virtual handles for dental implant manipulation in virtual reality implant planning procedure

  • By

  • Hanna-Riikka Rantamaa

  • Jari Kangas

  • Maarit Jordan

  • Helena Mehtonen

  • John Mäkelä

  • Kimmo Ronkainen

  • Markku Turunen

  • Osku Sundqvist

  • Ismo Syrjä

  • Jorma Järnstedt

  • Roope Raisamo

  • June 22, 2022

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Assessment of Virtual Tools for Manipulating Dental Implants in Virtual Reality Planning Procedures

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionDental implant surgery requiring precise 3D implant placement
Key MechanismsUse of virtual reality (VR) for 3D implant planning with direct interaction and virtual handles to manipulate implant position and orientation
Target PopulationDental professionals performing implant planning and surgery
Care SettingDental implant surgery planning and preoperative virtual simulation

Key Highlights

  • Traditional implant planning uses 2D screens and mouse input, limiting intuitive 3D manipulation.
  • VR enables immersive 3D visualization and direct manipulation of implants with hand controllers.
  • Virtual handles restrict degrees of freedom to improve fine-tuning accuracy but may increase manipulation time.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use 3D imaging data (e.g., CBCT) for accurate anatomical assessment prior to implant planning.

Management

  • Employ VR-based implant planning systems to allow immersive 3D visualization and manipulation.
  • Use direct interaction for coarse implant positioning and virtual handles for precise fine-tuning.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Evaluate implant placement accuracy and anatomical boundaries to avoid complications.
  • Monitor user interaction efficiency and accuracy when using VR tools.

Risks

  • Improper implant placement can cause bleeding, nerve injury, malposition, damage to adjacent teeth, or mandibular fracture.
  • Arm fatigue may occur with prolonged use of handheld VR controllers.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Patients requiring dental implants in anatomically challenging regions (molar, premolar, anterior jaw areas).

Accurate virtual planning improves functional and aesthetic outcomes and reduces surgical complications.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Perform thorough 3D diagnostics and treatment planning using CBCT imaging.
  • Utilize VR systems with hand controllers for intuitive implant manipulation.
  • Incorporate virtual handles to separate translation and rotation axes for precise implant positioning.
  • Balance use of direct interaction for speed and virtual handles for accuracy during implant planning.
  • Be aware of anatomical constraints such as maxillary sinuses, nasal cavities, and inferior alveolar nerve.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content