Evaluation of virtual handles for dental implant manipulation in virtual reality implant planning procedure
By
Hanna-Riikka Rantamaa
Jari Kangas
Maarit Jordan
Helena Mehtonen
John Mäkelä
Kimmo Ronkainen
Markku Turunen
Osku Sundqvist
Ismo Syrjä
Jorma Järnstedt
Roope Raisamo
June 22, 2022
Clinical Scorecard: Assessment of Virtual Tools for Manipulating Dental Implants in Virtual Reality Planning Procedures
At a Glance
Category Detail
Condition Dental implant surgery requiring precise 3D implant placement
Key Mechanisms Use of virtual reality (VR) for 3D implant planning with direct interaction and virtual handles to manipulate implant position and orientation
Target Population Dental professionals performing implant planning and surgery
Care Setting Dental implant surgery planning and preoperative virtual simulation
Key Highlights
Traditional implant planning uses 2D screens and mouse input, limiting intuitive 3D manipulation. VR enables immersive 3D visualization and direct manipulation of implants with hand controllers. Virtual handles restrict degrees of freedom to improve fine-tuning accuracy but may increase manipulation time.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
Use 3D imaging data (e.g., CBCT) for accurate anatomical assessment prior to implant planning.
Management
Employ VR-based implant planning systems to allow immersive 3D visualization and manipulation. Use direct interaction for coarse implant positioning and virtual handles for precise fine-tuning.
Monitoring & Follow-up
Evaluate implant placement accuracy and anatomical boundaries to avoid complications. Monitor user interaction efficiency and accuracy when using VR tools.
Risks
Improper implant placement can cause bleeding, nerve injury, malposition, damage to adjacent teeth, or mandibular fracture. Arm fatigue may occur with prolonged use of handheld VR controllers.
Patient & Prescribing Data
Patients requiring dental implants in anatomically challenging regions (molar, premolar, anterior jaw areas).
Accurate virtual planning improves functional and aesthetic outcomes and reduces surgical complications.
Clinical Best Practices
Perform thorough 3D diagnostics and treatment planning using CBCT imaging. Utilize VR systems with hand controllers for intuitive implant manipulation. Incorporate virtual handles to separate translation and rotation axes for precise implant positioning. Balance use of direct interaction for speed and virtual handles for accuracy during implant planning. Be aware of anatomical constraints such as maxillary sinuses, nasal cavities, and inferior alveolar nerve.
References