Textbook oncologic outcomes in elderly patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter study - Scorecard - MDSpire

Textbook oncologic outcomes in elderly patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter study

  • By

  • Alessandra Pulvirenti

  • Carlotta Parati

  • Simona Deidda

  • Daniela Rega

  • Gino Guarino

  • Mirko Armas

  • Ilaria Govoni

  • Silvia Negro

  • Quoc Riccardo Bao

  • Paolo Delrio

  • Angelo Restivo

  • Gaya Spolverato

  • August 25, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Surgery in Older Adults with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Insights from a Multicenter Study

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionLocally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) in elderly patients
Key MechanismsNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) aiming for radical resection and oncologic control
Target PopulationPatients aged ≥ 70 years with locally advanced mid-to-lower rectal adenocarcinoma
Care SettingHigh-volume tertiary centers performing multimodal oncologic treatment including surgery

Key Highlights

  • Standard treatment for LARC involves nCRT followed by surgery, improving oncologic outcomes but often limited in elderly due to comorbidities and frailty.
  • Textbook Oncologic Outcome (TOO) is a composite quality metric integrating surgical and oncologic benchmarks to assess treatment completeness and quality.
  • In this study of 157 elderly patients, 98% achieved R0 resection with low severe complication rates (8.9%) and no 90-day mortality, demonstrating feasibility of multimodal treatment.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use clinical staging with CT and MRI to define locally advanced disease (cT3-4 and/or cN+).
  • Define tumor location as mid-to-lower rectum if ≤ 10 cm from anal verge on MRI.

Management

  • Employ neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by low anterior resection (LAR) for curative intent in LARC.
  • Prefer minimally invasive surgical approaches when feasible, with ostomy creation (mostly ileostomy) and planned reversal.
  • Exclude patients with metastatic disease or requiring abdominoperineal resection or pelvic exenteration from this treatment protocol.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Monitor postoperative complications using Clavien-Dindo classification; aim for absence of major complications (grade < 3b).
  • Track length of hospital stay, readmission within 30 days, and 90-day mortality as quality indicators.
  • Follow patients longitudinally for overall survival and recurrence using appropriate statistical methods.

Risks

  • Higher prevalence of comorbidities and frailty in elderly may increase risk of undertreatment and poorer cancer-specific survival.
  • Potential for postoperative morbidity necessitates careful patient selection and perioperative management.
  • Reduced lymph node yield after nCRT should be considered when evaluating surgical pathology.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Elderly patients (≥ 70 years) with locally advanced mid-to-lower rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing nCRT and surgery

High rates of R0 resection (98%) and low severe complication rates (8.9%) indicate that multimodal treatment is feasible and safe in selected elderly patients; ileostomy reversal achieved in 77% with median 174 days to reversal.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Adopt a multidisciplinary approach to balance oncologic efficacy and treatment-related morbidity in elderly patients.
  • Use Textbook Oncologic Outcome (TOO) criteria to evaluate quality and completeness of treatment.
  • Prefer minimally invasive surgery when possible to reduce morbidity.
  • Ensure comprehensive preoperative staging and patient assessment to optimize treatment selection.
  • Monitor postoperative outcomes closely to identify and manage complications early.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content