Shaping the future of multiple myeloma with artificial intelligence and digital twins: from concept to clinic - Scorecard - MDSpire

Shaping the future of multiple myeloma with artificial intelligence and digital twins: from concept to clinic

  • By

  • Cindy H. Lee

  • Yang Zhang

  • Barbara J. McClure

  • Angelina Yong

  • Hamish S. Scott

  • Chung Hoow Kok

  • March 18, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Transforming the landscape of multiple myeloma through artificial intelligence and digital twin technology: advancing from theory to practice

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionMultiple myeloma (MM), an incurable hematological malignancy with significant clinical and biological heterogeneity
Key MechanismsGenomic abnormalities, multi-omics data integration, AI-driven predictive modeling, and digital twin virtual patient replicas for dynamic disease simulation
Target PopulationNewly diagnosed and relapsed multiple myeloma patients, including high-risk (HR) and functional high-risk (FHR) subgroups
Care SettingSpecialized hematology/oncology clinical settings with access to advanced diagnostics and digital health technologies

Key Highlights

  • Current risk stratification systems (ISS, R-ISS, R2-ISS, MASS, IMWG definitions) incorporate genomic and clinical markers but have limitations in specificity and real-time applicability.
  • Artificial intelligence (AI) integrates large-scale multi-omics, imaging, and longitudinal clinical data to generate real-time predictive models for therapy selection.
  • Digital twin (DT) technology creates dynamic, patient-specific virtual models enabling simulation of disease progression and therapeutic response with iterative risk recalibration.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use genomic-based definitions of high-risk MM including deletion 17p (>20% plasma cells), TP53 mutation, biallelic deletion 1p32, and co-existence of intermediate-risk abnormalities with elevated beta-2-microglobulin.
  • Incorporate measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment as a key prognostic marker using validated methodologies.
  • Consider emerging biomarkers such as plasma cell leukemia, circulating tumor cells, extramedullary disease, and gene expression profiling signatures (e.g., SKY92, UAMS70).

Management

  • Tailor therapeutic strategies based on precise identification of high-risk and functional high-risk patients to optimize outcomes.
  • Leverage AI-driven predictive models to inform therapy selection in the context of rapidly evolving treatment options.
  • Utilize digital twin simulations to anticipate disease progression and treatment response for personalized management.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Continuously acquire and integrate patient data to update risk stratification dynamically via AI and digital twin platforms.
  • Monitor measurable residual disease status longitudinally to guide treatment decisions and detect early relapse.
  • Regularly reassess risk profiles incorporating new biological and clinical determinants as they emerge.

Risks

  • Limitations of current prognostic models include poor specificity, inter-classification discordance, and inability to fully capture multi-hit disease.
  • Rapid evolution of MM therapies challenges the real-time applicability of static risk stratification systems.
  • Potential controversies and limitations exist in AI and digital twin technologies regarding data integration, model validation, and clinical implementation.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed multiple myeloma, including those identified as high-risk or functional high-risk

AI and digital twin technologies facilitate personalized therapy selection by integrating comprehensive patient data and simulating treatment responses, aiming to improve outcomes and reduce early relapse rates.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Incorporate comprehensive genomic and clinical data for accurate risk stratification in MM.
  • Adopt AI and digital twin technologies as adjunct tools to enhance precision medicine approaches.
  • Continuously update risk models and treatment plans based on dynamic patient data and emerging biomarkers.
  • Engage multidisciplinary teams to interpret complex data outputs and integrate them into clinical decision-making.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content