The quality evaluation of information in hospice and palliative care short videos on Douyin (TikTok's Chinese version) and Bilibili: a cross-sectional study - Scorecard - MDSpire
Advertisement
The quality evaluation of information in hospice and palliative care short videos on Douyin (TikTok's Chinese version) and Bilibili: a cross-sectional study
Clinical Scorecard: Assessment of Information Quality in Short Videos on Hospice and Palliative Care from Douyin and Bilibili: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
At a Glance
Category
Detail
Condition
Hospice and Palliative Care (HPC)
Key Mechanisms
Assessment of video quality and reliability using validated scoring tools.
Target Population
Individuals seeking health-related information on hospice and palliative care.
Care Setting
Short video platforms (Douyin and Bilibili)
Key Highlights
Douyin videos scored higher in quality than Bilibili (GQS median score 4.75 vs 4.40, p < 0.001).
Healthcare professional-uploaded videos had better quality ratings across all assessment methods.
User engagement (likes, comments, shares) was significantly greater on Douyin.
Weak positive correlation between likes and GQS scores indicates popularity metrics are not reliable surrogates of information quality.
Overall, HPC-related videos had fair quality with significant areas for improvement.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
Management
Monitoring & Follow-up
Risks
Patient & Prescribing Data
Individuals needing hospice and palliative care information.
Content quality varies significantly, with professional input leading to higher quality.
Clinical Best Practices
Enhance regulation of content on short video platforms.
Promote authoritative health information to improve reliability.
