Patient-reported outcomes after idecabtagene vicleucel vs. ciltacabtagene autoleucel CAR-T for multiple myeloma - Scorecard - MDSpire

Patient-reported outcomes after idecabtagene vicleucel vs. ciltacabtagene autoleucel CAR-T for multiple myeloma

  • By

  • Laura B. Oswald

  • Xiaoyin Li

  • Lisa M. Gudenkauf

  • Gabe De Avila

  • David Scheiber-Camoretti

  • Brent J. Small

  • Brian D. Gonzalez

  • Aasha I. Hoogland

  • Oanh Nguyen

  • Yvelise Rodriguez

  • Sylvia L. Crowder

  • Nathan H. Parker

  • Tiffany L. Carson

  • Christine E. Vinci

  • Rachid C. Baz

  • Kenneth H. Shain

  • Brandon Blue

  • Ariel Grajales-Cruz

  • Kristy Matte

  • Brandon Kale

  • David Kaldas

  • Fabiana Perna

  • Melissa Alsina

  • Ciara L. Freeman

  • Omar Castaneda Puglianini

  • Taiga Nishihori

  • Hien Liu

  • Frederick L. Locke

  • Heather S. L. Jim

  • Lauren C. Peres

  • Doris K. Hansen

  • May 11, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Comparative Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Idecabtagene Vicleucel and Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel CAR-T Therapy in Multiple Myeloma Patients

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
Condition
Key Mechanisms
Target Population
Care SettingMoffitt Cancer Center, an NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center involved in the study.

Key Highlights

  • Add specific statistics or data points to substantiate claims about PRO improvements.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

    Management

      Monitoring & Follow-up

      • Specify the frequency and methods for PRO assessments beyond the initial timeline.

      Risks

        Patient & Prescribing Data

        Cite the studies or trials that provide the response rates for ide-cel and cilta-cel.

        Clinical Best Practices

        • suggestions

        References

        Original Source(s)

        Related Content