Timing and Dose Offer Different Perspectives: Response to Wieruszewski and Khanna
-
By
-
Žiga Kalamar
-
Giovanni Landoni
-
Andrej Markota
-
October 12, 2026
Clinical Scorecard: Timing and Dose Offer Different Perspectives: Response to Wieruszewski and Khanna
At a Glance
| Category | Detail |
|---|---|
| Condition | Septic shock and multimodal vasopressor therapy |
| Key Mechanisms | Vasopressor dose reflects both elapsed time and the speed and severity of hemodynamic deterioration; chronological timing and dose are distinct measures. |
| Target Population | Patients with sepsis or septic shock requiring vasopressor support, including patients considered for adjunctive non-catecholamine vasopressors. |
| Care Setting | Hospital-based treatment and clinical trials of septic shock; the article discusses TRICYCLE and ATHOS-3 enrollment timing. |
Key Highlights
- In TRICYCLE, median time from earliest documented hospital presentation with sepsis or septic shock to randomization was 5.2 hours in the intervention group and 7.1 hours in the control group.
- TRICYCLE allowed enrollment up to 12 hours after the vasopressor eligibility threshold; this was the maximum permitted window, not the observed interval from threshold attainment to randomization.
- ATHOS-3 enrolled patients after more than 0.2 µg/kg/min norepinephrine-equivalent support for 6–48 hours, so its timing reference differed from TRICYCLE’s.
- Similar vasopressor doses at randomization do not establish comparable shock duration or stage.
- The authors argue that a fixed vasopressor dose ceiling alone is not a suitable criterion for defining early multimodal therapy.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
Management
- The authors do not consider an upper vasopressor dose ceiling to be the sole, or necessarily the most suitable, criterion for characterizing multimodal vasopressor therapy as early.
- The article reports that prior studies associated non-catecholaminergic vasopressors with improved survival across diverse vasodilatory shock populations, including established shock, and associated early addition with improved survival among patients receiving high-dose norepinephrine.
Monitoring & Follow-up
- Future trials should describe treatment timing relative to preceding vasopressor exposure more comprehensively and clarify the optimal initiation window.
- The authors note that broader assessment of disturbances affecting the renin–angiotensin system may help refine patient phenotyping.
Risks
- A fixed dose ceiling could exclude patients treated early whose shock progresses rapidly, potentially omitting a clinically important subgroup.
- Comparisons of treatment timing are constrained when studies use different clinical starting points, such as hospital presentation versus shock onset or duration of vasopressor exposure.
Patient & Prescribing Data
Patients with sepsis or septic shock requiring vasopressor support; TRICYCLE and ATHOS-3 used different enrollment timing criteria.
TRICYCLE’s median interval from earliest documented hospital presentation to randomization was 5.2 hours for intervention and 7.1 hours for control. ATHOS-3 required more than 0.2 µg/kg/min norepinephrine-equivalent support for 6–48 hours before enrollment.
Clinical Best Practices
- Distinguish vasopressor dose from elapsed time when describing whether multimodal therapy was initiated early.
- When reporting trial timing, specify the clinical event used as the starting point and the interval from vasopressor eligibility to randomization.
- Do not infer shock duration or stage from vasopressor dose at randomization alone.
Related Resources & Content
Based on findings from:
Timing and dose do not tell the same story: a reply to Wieruszewski and Khanna
Žiga Kalamar, Giovanni Landoni, Andrej Markota. Critical Care, 2026.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13054-026-06394-y
This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.