HHS and EPA Announce New Scientific Partnership to Strengthen Glyphosate Review - Scorecard - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

HHS and EPA Collaborate on Scientific Initiative to Enhance Glyphosate Evaluation

  • By

  • Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs (ASPA)

  • September 22, 2026

Share

Clinical Scorecard: HHS and EPA Collaborate on Scientific Initiative to Enhance Glyphosate Evaluation

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionGlyphosate Evaluation
Key MechanismsInteragency collaboration to enhance scientific evaluation and coordination regarding glyphosate's health effects.
Target PopulationGeneral population, with particular focus on infants and children.
Care SettingEnvironmental health and regulatory assessment.

Key Highlights

  • HHS and EPA signed a Memorandum of Understanding to improve glyphosate evaluation.
  • The partnership aims to address gaps in research and enhance the evidence base for glyphosate's health effects.
  • EPA will conduct a systematic evaluation of new peer-reviewed research on glyphosate.
  • The agreement emphasizes transparency and coordination in scientific assessments.
  • EPA retains authority for registration decisions under FIFRA.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Ongoing assessment of glyphosate's human health risks including cancer and reproductive effects.

Management

  • Coordination of research and information sharing between HHS and EPA.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Identification of data gaps that may require further research or monitoring.

Risks

  • Potential human health effects from glyphosate exposure, particularly in vulnerable populations.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Individuals exposed to glyphosate through food, workplaces, and environment.

No new treatment insights provided; focus is on evaluation and risk assessment.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Utilize the strongest available science in pesticide registration reviews.
  • Incorporate findings from peer-reviewed research into risk assessments.
  • Maintain transparency in the scientific review process.

Related Resources & Content

Original Source(s)

Related Content