Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in renal cell carcinoma venous tumour thrombus shrinkage (UroCCR 128) - Scorecard - MDSpire

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in renal cell carcinoma venous tumour thrombus shrinkage (UroCCR 128)

  • By

  • Fabien Moinard-Butot

  • Jonathan Thouvenin

  • Pierre Bigot

  • Nieves Martinez-Chanza

  • Victor Gaillard

  • Roberto Luigi Cazzato

  • Romain Boissier

  • Gaëlle Margue

  • Philippe Boudier

  • Denis Maillet

  • Marine Gross-Goupil

  • Jean-Christophe Bernhard

  • Philippe Barthélémy

  • January 10, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Effectiveness of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Reducing Venous Tumor Thrombus in Renal Cell Carcinoma (UroCCR 128)

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionRenal Cell Carcinoma with Venous Tumor Thrombus (VTT)
Key MechanismsImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) modulate immune response to target tumor cells; combined with VEGFR-targeted therapies or other ICIs to improve survival and response rates
Target PopulationPatients with locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma presenting with venous tumor thrombus
Care SettingMulticentric European oncology centers; systemic therapy with ICIs as first-line or beyond

Key Highlights

  • VTT occurs in 4–10% of localized RCC and complicates surgical management with higher morbidity and poor prognosis
  • ICI-based therapies have shown improved overall survival and response rates compared to sunitinib in metastatic RCC
  • Retrospective study of 44 patients showed use of ICIs (alone or combined) in RCC with VTT, with radiological assessment per RECIST v1.1 and Novick’s classification

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Histological confirmation of RCC with VTT at diagnosis
  • Radiological assessment using CT or MRI to evaluate tumor and thrombus extent
  • Classification of VTT extent using Novick’s classification (levels I-IV)

Management

  • First-line treatment with ICI-based regimens (ICI-ICI, ICI-TKI, or ICI monotherapy) for metastatic RCC with VTT
  • Consider radical nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy for localized disease or delayed surgery after systemic therapy
  • Dose reductions permitted for toxicity based on standard recommendations

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Radiological tumor assessment using RECIST v1.1 criteria to evaluate objective response rate
  • Regular imaging follow-up to assess VTT size and extension
  • Clinical and laboratory monitoring per institutional protocols

Risks

  • High morbidity associated with surgery for VTT, especially with vena cava involvement
  • Potential toxicity from ICI-based therapies requiring dose adjustments
  • Poor prognosis despite treatment, with 5-year survival rates of 40–60% in VTT patients

Patient & Prescribing Data

44 patients with locally advanced or metastatic RCC with VTT; median age 69; majority clear cell carcinoma; IMDC intermediate or poor risk

82% treated first-line with ICI-based therapy; regimens included ICI-ICI (52%), ICI monotherapy (30%), and ICI-TKI (18%); median VTT diameter 22 mm; some patients underwent delayed nephrectomy and thrombectomy after systemic therapy

Clinical Best Practices

  • Use multidisciplinary approach including oncologists, radiologists, and surgeons for management of RCC with VTT
  • Employ standardized imaging and classification systems (RECIST v1.1 and Novick’s) for consistent assessment
  • Consider neoadjuvant ICI-based therapy to potentially reduce VTT extension and facilitate surgery
  • Monitor patients closely for treatment response and toxicity, adjusting doses as needed
  • Recognize the high surgical morbidity and tailor treatment plans accordingly

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content