Photon-counting CT-derived hepatic extracellular volume quantification for noninvasive risk stratification of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH): a prospective cohort study - Scorecard - MDSpire

Photon-counting CT-derived hepatic extracellular volume quantification for noninvasive risk stratification of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH): a prospective cohort study

  • By

  • Tatjana Dell

  • Verena Tischler

  • Dario Zocholl

  • Narine Mesropyan

  • Alice Margarida Jacob

  • Johannes Chang

  • Bernhard Schmidt

  • Claus Christian Pieper

  • Alexander Isaak

  • Patrick Kupczyk

  • Carsten Meyer

  • Julian Luetkens

  • Christian Strassburg

  • Christian Jansen

  • Daniel Kuetting

  • December 23, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Noninvasive Assessment of Hepatic Extracellular Volume via Photon-Counting CT for Risk Stratification in Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension: A Prospective Cohort Analysis

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionClinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) in chronic liver disease and cirrhosis
Key MechanismsHepatic extracellular volume (ECV) quantification via photon-counting CT (PCCT) as a surrogate marker correlating with fibrosis severity and portal hypertension risk
Target PopulationAdults (≥18 years) with chronic liver disease undergoing liver imaging and fibrosis assessment
Care SettingHospital or specialized liver centers with access to PCCT and liver fibrosis assessment tools

Key Highlights

  • CSPH marks a critical transition in compensated advanced chronic liver disease, increasing risk of severe complications.
  • Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement is the reference standard but limited by invasiveness and availability.
  • PCCT-derived hepatic extracellular volume (ECV) offers a noninvasive, reproducible imaging biomarker to stratify CSPH risk complementing liver stiffness measurement (LSM).

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use noninvasive liver disease assessment (NILDA) including liver stiffness measurement (LSM) as pragmatic surrogates for CSPH risk stratification.
  • Consider PCCT-derived hepatic ECV quantification as an adjunct imaging biomarker to improve risk stratification in patients undergoing routine liver imaging.

Management

  • Monitor patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) for transition to CSPH using noninvasive surrogates.
  • Incorporate imaging-based ECV measurement to complement elastography and histology in clinical decision-making.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Regular surveillance imaging for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be leveraged to assess hepatic ECV without additional scans.
  • Use LSM thresholds (≥ 25 kPa rule-in, ≤ 15 kPa rule-out) alongside ECV to monitor fibrosis progression and portal hypertension risk.

Risks

  • Limitations of LSM include operator dependency and reduced reliability in obesity or ascites.
  • Invasive HVPG measurement carries procedural risks and limited availability, underscoring need for noninvasive alternatives.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Adults with chronic liver disease undergoing fibrosis and portal hypertension risk assessment

PCCT-derived hepatic ECV measurement provides an objective, reproducible biomarker that may guide risk stratification and management decisions without additional invasive procedures.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Perform PCCT imaging with delayed equilibrium phase iodine mapping for accurate hepatic ECV quantification.
  • Place multiple regions of interest in predefined liver segments avoiding vessels and artifacts for iodine density measurement.
  • Calculate hepatic ECV using iodine density ratios corrected for hematocrit obtained within 24 hours of imaging.
  • Integrate PCCT-derived ECV data with established noninvasive markers such as LSM and histology for comprehensive fibrosis and CSPH assessment.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content