Survival outcomes with Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patient according to baseline tumor characteristics - Scorecard - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Survival Outcomes After Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer by Baseline Tumor Features

  • By

  • Mike Wenzel

  • Quynh Chi Le

  • Carolin Siech

  • Benedikt Hoeh

  • Konrad Klimek

  • Christian Happel

  • Fred Saad

  • Felix Preisser

  • Derya Tilki

  • Markus Graefen

  • Thomas Steuber

  • Tobias Maurer

  • Maximilian C. Kriegmair

  • Pierre I. Karakiewicz

  • Felix K. H. Chun

  • Daniel Groener

  • Philipp Mandel

  • October 20, 2026

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Survival Outcomes After Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer by Baseline Tumor Features

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionClinical topic addressed by the source article: Survival Outcomes After Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer by Baseline Tumor Features
Key MechanismsMechanisms or clinical associations described in the source article.
Target Population344 patients with mCRPC, with prior synchronous (n=198) or metachronous (n=146) mHSPC, treated with Lu-177-PSMA during mCRPC treatment lines 1–7.
Care SettingCare setting described in the source article.

Key Highlights

  • The retrospective cohort included 344 patients: 198 with synchronous and 146 with metachronous mHSPC before mCRPC.
  • The supplied excerpt describes the study methods and cohort characteristics but does not provide PFS or OS results.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Study eligibility required PSMA-PET/CT showing PSMA-positive lesions before Lu-177-PSMA treatment.
  • At the mHSPC stage, M-stage classification was based mainly on CT and bone scan or PSMA-PET/CT. M1b included bone metastases with or without lymph-node metastases; M1c included visceral metastases with or without bone or lymph-node metastases.

Management

  • At the study center, Lu-177-PSMA was administered every 4–6 weeks using PSMA-617 or PSMA-I&T.
  • Treatment was administered as individual compassionate use after tumor-board discussion or following EMA approval after ARPI and taxane-based chemotherapy.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • PFS was defined from Lu-177-PSMA initiation to a new systemic treatment or death; OS was defined from treatment initiation to death from any cause.
  • Patients were evaluated and discussed by a multimodal tumor board before and after treatment.

Risks

  • The supplied excerpt does not report treatment-related adverse events or safety outcomes.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Patients with mCRPC and prior synchronous or metachronous mHSPC treated with Lu-177-PSMA in treatment lines 1–7; median age at mCRPC was 71 years, and the median number of Lu-177-PSMA cycles was 4.

The median number of systemic mCRPC treatment lines was 3. The supplied excerpt does not provide the distribution of Lu-177-PSMA treatment lines.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Study eligibility required PSMA-positive lesions on PSMA-PET/CT.
  • Patients were evaluated and discussed by a multimodal tumor board before and after treatment.
  • The study was a retrospective analysis of patients treated at a single center.

Related Resources & Content

Original Source(s)

Related Content