States sue HHS over youth gender-affirming care declaration - Scorecard - MDSpire

States sue HHS over youth gender-affirming care declaration

  • By

  • Ali Swenson

  • December 24, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: States File Lawsuit Against HHS Regarding Youth Gender-Affirming Care Statement

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionGender dysphoria in children and adolescents
Key MechanismsPuberty blockers, hormone therapy, surgeries as gender-affirming care
Target PopulationChildren and adolescents experiencing gender dysphoria
Care SettingMedical providers offering gender-affirming treatments

Key Highlights

  • HHS issued a declaration labeling gender-affirming treatments for youth as unsafe and ineffective.
  • A coalition of 19 states and DC sued HHS to block enforcement of the declaration, citing legal and medical inaccuracies.
  • Major medical organizations oppose restrictions on gender-affirming care for young people.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Diagnosis of gender dysphoria based on distress from incongruence between gender identity and sex assigned at birth.

Management

  • Gender-affirming care includes puberty blockers, hormone therapy, and surgeries.
  • Behavioral therapy was suggested by HHS report but is contested by major medical groups.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Consent considerations for adolescents regarding life-changing treatments.
  • Ongoing evaluation of treatment efficacy and safety.

Risks

  • Concerns raised about potential future infertility from treatments.
  • Legal and policy risks due to federal restrictions and state bans.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Children and adolescents with gender dysphoria

Access to gender-affirming care is increasingly limited by federal declarations and state laws, despite medical consensus supporting its necessity.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Provide medically necessary gender-affirming care based on established standards of care.
  • Respect patient consent and age-appropriate decision-making.
  • Advocate for evidence-based policies and oppose restrictions unsupported by medical evidence.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content