Outcomes of endovascular aortic arch repair with an off-the-shelf modular inner branched stent-graft: an IDEAL 2a prospective multicentre trial - Scorecard - MDSpire

Outcomes of endovascular aortic arch repair with an off-the-shelf modular inner branched stent-graft: an IDEAL 2a prospective multicentre trial

  • By

  • Wei Guo

  • Dan Rong

  • Hongkun Zhang

  • Leiyang Zhang

  • Hui Zhuang

  • Hua Peng

  • Xuejun Wu

  • Kunmei Gong

  • Wei Wang

  • Zhen Li

  • Weiguo Fu

  • Xiaoming Zhang

  • Mingjin Guo

  • Guangqi Chang

  • Xiangchen Dai

  • Jian Zuo

  • Yingqiang Guo

  • Bing Chen

  • Lei Zhang

  • Taoran Zhang

  • Hongpeng Zhang

  • January 9, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Results of a Prospective Multicenter Trial on Endovascular Repair of the Aortic Arch Using a Standard Modular Inner Branched Stent-Graft: An IDEAL 2a Study

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionAortic arch pathologies requiring repair
Key MechanismsEndovascular repair using a non-customized modular inner branched stent-graft system to reconstruct the aortic arch
Target PopulationPatients with aortic arch pathology deemed high-risk or unsuitable for open surgery
Care SettingMulticenter high-volume aortic centers performing endovascular procedures

Key Highlights

  • Technical success rate of 100% with the modular inner branched stent-graft system
  • 30-day mortality rate of 3% and stroke rate of 9% post-procedure
  • Overall survival rates of 91%, 86%, and 81% at 12, 24, and 36 months respectively

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Multidisciplinary evaluation including vascular surgeon, cardiovascular surgeon, and anesthetist
  • Imaging with CT angiography pre- and post-procedure at 1, 6, 12 months and annually thereafter

Management

  • Use of non-customized modular inner branched stent-graft (WeFlow-Arch) for endovascular repair in high-risk or unsuitable open surgery patients
  • Strict adherence to device instructions for use
  • Consideration of hybrid or open surgery alternatives based on patient risk and anatomy

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Clinical examination and CT angiography follow-up at scheduled intervals (1, 6, 12 months, then annually)
  • Monitoring for complications such as endoleaks and stroke
  • Assessment for need of reintervention

Risks

  • Perioperative stroke (observed 9% rate)
  • Early mortality (3% within 30 days)
  • Potential for endoleaks, though none required reintervention in this study

Patient & Prescribing Data

88 patients with aortic arch pathology enrolled from June 2021 to December 2024 across 17 Chinese centers

Modular branched stent-graft repair is feasible with safety outcomes comparable to custom-made devices, hybrid techniques, and open surgery; long-term comparative effectiveness remains to be established

Clinical Best Practices

  • Perform patient selection via multidisciplinary team assessment focusing on surgical risk and anatomical suitability
  • Employ modular inner branched stent-graft as an off-the-shelf option to reduce waiting times associated with custom devices
  • Schedule systematic follow-up with clinical and imaging assessments to detect complications early
  • Maintain adherence to device-specific procedural protocols to optimize technical success
  • Consider endovascular repair primarily in patients unfit for open surgery as per expert consensus

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content