Comparative effectiveness of aerobic training intensities in chronic stroke: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials - Scorecard - MDSpire

Comparative effectiveness of aerobic training intensities in chronic stroke: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  • By

  • Qiu Peng

  • Yidong Xia

  • Haoyuan Hei

  • July 6, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Effectiveness Comparison of Aerobic Exercise Intensities in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionChronic Stroke
Key MechanismsAerobic exercise modalities improve cardiopulmonary fitness and functional recovery outcomes.
Target PopulationChronic stroke patients (≥3 months post-stroke)
Care SettingRehabilitation settings focusing on physical exercise interventions

Key Highlights

  • HIIT and MICT showed significant effects on VO2peak, 6MWT, and 10MWT.
  • No statistically significant differences for BBS or TUG among interventions.
  • Evidence certainty was predominantly low to very low across comparisons.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Assess functional recovery outcomes post-stroke using standardized tests.

Management

  • Implement HIIT or MICT as part of rehabilitation for chronic stroke patients.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Evaluate VO2peak, walking performance, and balance regularly.

Risks

  • Consider low evidence certainty when interpreting results for balance and TUG.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Chronic stroke patients with motor impairments.

Aerobic exercise is essential for improving physical function and preventing cardiovascular decline.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Utilize a consistency-based random-effects model for evaluating exercise interventions.
  • Conduct sensitivity analyses to ensure robustness of findings.

Related Resources & Content

Original Source(s)

Related Content