Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a practical alternative to mHLA-DR measurement in delayed sepsis-induced immunosuppression - Scorecard - MDSpire

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a practical alternative to mHLA-DR measurement in delayed sepsis-induced immunosuppression

  • By

  • Thomas Lafon

  • Fabienne Venet

  • Anne-Claire Lukaszewicz

  • Guillaume Monneret

  • March 31, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a viable substitute for mHLA-DR assessment in immunosuppression following delayed sepsis

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionSepsis-induced immunosuppression in critically ill patients
Key MechanismsImmuno-inflammatory alterations including neutrophilia, lymphopenia, and decreased monocyte HLA-DR expression
Target PopulationPatients with septic shock exhibiting delayed immunosuppression
Care SettingIntensive Care Unit (ICU)

Key Highlights

  • Monocyte HLA-DR (mHLA-DR) < 8000 AB/C is a validated biomarker for sepsis-induced immunosuppression but not widely available.
  • Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) > 10 at day 7 post-ICU admission correlates with low mHLA-DR and identifies immunosuppressed patients.
  • NLR is a practical, universally accessible surrogate marker that integrates neutrophilia, immature neutrophils, and lymphopenia.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use mHLA-DR < 8000 AB/C to identify sepsis-induced immunosuppression when available.
  • Consider NLR > 10 at day 7 as a provisional marker for immunosuppression in settings lacking mHLA-DR measurement.

Management

  • Select patients with low mHLA-DR or high NLR for potential immunostimulatory therapies such as interferon-γ.
  • Use NLR as an alarm parameter to trigger further immunological assessment.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Perform serial mHLA-DR measurements during the first week of ICU admission when possible.
  • Monitor NLR from routine complete blood counts at day 7 to assess immune status.

Risks

  • NLR may not accurately assess immunosuppression in patients with profound neutropenia or lymphopenia.
  • Discordance between NLR and mHLA-DR exists; further investigation is needed to understand underlying mechanisms.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Critically ill septic shock patients with delayed immunosuppression identified by low mHLA-DR or high NLR

Immunostimulatory therapy (e.g., interferon-γ) trials select patients based on mHLA-DR < 8000 AB/C; NLR > 10 may help identify candidates where mHLA-DR is unavailable.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Incorporate NLR measurement from routine blood counts as a complementary tool to mHLA-DR for immunomonitoring.
  • Use NLR > 10 as a practical, provisional biomarker to identify patients at risk of immunosuppression and ICU-acquired infections.
  • Validate NLR thresholds and clinical utility in larger, diverse ICU populations before widespread adoption.
  • Recognize limitations of NLR in patients with abnormal leukocyte profiles and pursue additional immunological testing as needed.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content