Outcomes of malignant orbital tumors: a 22-year Norwegian single-center series - Scorecard - MDSpire

Outcomes of malignant orbital tumors: a 22-year Norwegian single-center series

  • By

  • Bendik Alvheim Sundfjord

  • Julie Selvik Bentzon

  • Signe Johnsen Landa

  • Svein Arthur Jensen

  • Dorota Goplen

  • Jon Espen Dale

  • Stein Lybak

  • Hans Olav Ueland

  • Eyvind Rødahl

  • June 24, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Long-term Results of Malignant Orbital Tumors: A 22-Year Study from a Norwegian Single-Center Experience

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionMalignant Orbital Tumors
Key MechanismsTumors can be primary or secondary, with various histological subtypes.
Target PopulationPatients with malignant orbital tumors treated at Haukeland University Hospital.
Care SettingOphthalmology department at a referral center in Western Norway.

Key Highlights

  • 76 patients included, with a median age of 64 years at diagnosis.
  • Most common tumor types: secondary invading tumors (46%), lymphoproliferative (24%), metastatic (16%), primary orbital tumors (14%).
  • Overall disease-specific 5-year survival rate was 59%, varying by tumor type.
  • Surgical removal was performed in 55% of patients, with 72% receiving local radiotherapy.
  • Incidence of malignant orbital tumors in Western Norway estimated at 0.30 per 100,000 inhabitants.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Biopsy and histopathologic confirmation are essential for diagnosis.

Management

  • Treatment options include surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy based on histological features and staging.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Regular follow-up for local/regional relapses or distant metastases is recommended.

Risks

  • Higher risk of local/regional relapses or distant metastases observed in 42% of patients.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Patients with malignant orbital tumors treated from 1999 to 2020.

Multimodal treatments have improved outcomes, with a focus on less invasive techniques.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Prompt diagnosis and treatment are crucial for better prognosis.
  • Consideration of volume-outcome relationships in treatment settings.

Related Resources & Content

Original Source(s)

Related Content