Integrated polyetheretherketone patient-specific implants for multi-subunit midface concavity: a retrospective case series
By
Xin Wang
Sihan Wu
Menghao Wang
Tianhang Wu
Xiangyu Zheng
Fei Li
Xiaowei Wang
Zhihan Hu
Xinyi Chen
Qiming Zhao
Xiaoping Chen
Yue Chen
July 7, 2026
Clinical Scorecard: Customized Integrated Polyetheretherketone Implants for Addressing Multi-Subunit Midface Concavity: A Retrospective Analysis
At a Glance
Category Detail
Condition Multi-subunit midface concavity Key Mechanisms Use of integrated polyetheretherketone (PEEK) patient-specific implants designed with CAD/CAM technology. Target Population Adults with normal or essentially normal occlusion and moderate-to-severe midface concavity. Care Setting Department of Plastic Surgery, Zhejiang Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University.
Key Highlights
Sixty-two implants placed in 31 patients with successful outcomes. 90.3% of patients reported satisfaction or very satisfaction at late follow-up. Transient postoperative edema and hypoesthesia were common but resolved spontaneously. Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
Clinical examination and CT imaging to assess midfacial concavity. Management
Bilateral integrated PEEK patient-specific implants for augmentation. Monitoring & Follow-up
Postoperative follow-up for aesthetic satisfaction and adverse events. Risks
Transient edema and hypoesthesia; no serious complications like infection or nerve injury observed. Patient & Prescribing Data
Adults aged 18 years and older with moderate-to-severe midface concavity.
Customized implants provide a solution for complex midfacial deformities without malocclusion.
Clinical Best Practices
Utilize CAD/CAM technology for implant design to ensure anatomical conformity. Assess soft-tissue coverage and scarring before implant placement. Related Resources & Content
