Independent validation of CT radiomics models in colorectal liver metastases: predicting local tumour progression after ablation - Scorecard - MDSpire

Independent validation of CT radiomics models in colorectal liver metastases: predicting local tumour progression after ablation

  • By

  • Denise J. van der Reijd

  • Corentin Guerendel

  • Femke C. R. Staal

  • Milou P. Busard

  • Mateus De Oliveira Taveira

  • Elisabeth G. Klompenhouwer

  • Koert F. D. Kuhlmann

  • Adriaan Moelker

  • Cornelis Verhoef

  • Martijn P. A. Starmans

  • Doenja M. J. Lambregts

  • Regina G. H. Beets-Tan

  • Sean Benson

  • Monique Maas

  • November 21, 2023

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Validation of CT Radiomics Models for Predicting Local Tumor Progression in Colorectal Liver Metastases Following Ablation

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionColorectal liver metastases (CRLM) treated with thermal ablation
Key MechanismsPrediction of local tumor progression (LTP) using radiomics features from post-ablation contrast-enhanced CT images combined with clinical parameters
Target PopulationPatients with CRLM undergoing thermal ablation (microwave or radiofrequency ablation)
Care SettingMulticentre tertiary care institutions with imaging and interventional radiology capabilities

Key Highlights

  • Thermal ablation is an alternative to resection for CRLM but has LTP rates of 6–46%.
  • LTP detection by contrast-enhanced CT has limited sensitivity (53%) due to similar imaging characteristics of post-ablation effects and recurrence.
  • Combined clinical-radiomics models from post-ablation CT images can predict LTP with good performance (c-statistic 0.78), enabling risk stratification.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Use contrast-enhanced portal venous phase CT 2–8 weeks post-ablation for initial assessment.
  • Define LTP as new tumor foci within 10 mm of the ablation zone on follow-up imaging within 24 months.
  • Employ MRI or PET-CT as problem-solving modalities when CT findings are equivocal.

Management

  • Consider complementary treatment promptly for patients predicted to have high risk of LTP based on radiomics models.
  • De-intensify follow-up imaging schedules for patients at low risk of LTP to reduce unnecessary imaging burden.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Schedule follow-up contrast-enhanced CT every 3 months in the first year post-ablation, then every 6 months up to 5 years.
  • Monitor for new lesions within 10 mm of the ablation zone to detect LTP early.

Risks

  • Incomplete ablation (residual disease, margins <5 mm) increases risk of LTP and should be excluded from predictive modeling.
  • Post-ablation imaging artifacts (e.g., air, abscess) can complicate LTP detection.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Patients with histopathologically confirmed CRLM treated with thermal ablation and available portal venous phase CT imaging post-ablation

Radiomics combined with clinical data can stratify patients by LTP risk, guiding personalized follow-up and timely additional interventions.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Ensure high-quality contrast-enhanced CT imaging with standardized acquisition protocols for reliable radiomics analysis.
  • Exclude patients with >5 ablated CRLM, lesions >3 cm, diffuse liver disease, or prior liver treatments affecting parenchyma to maintain model validity.
  • Perform manual delineation of ablation zone and peri-ablational rim for radiomics feature extraction.
  • Use external validation cohorts to confirm generalizability of predictive models before clinical implementation.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content