International survey on diagnostic reference levels based on clinical indications in plain radiography - Scorecard - MDSpire

International survey on diagnostic reference levels based on clinical indications in plain radiography

  • By

  • Alexander A. Schegerer

  • Georg Stamm

  • Christoph Aberle

  • Josefin Ammon

  • Babak Bazrafshan

  • Markus Borowski

  • Rainer Eßeling

  • Bärbel Madsack

  • Roman Menz

  • Constance Müller

  • Nadia Oberhofer

  • Bernhard Renger

  • Julian Singer

  • Michael Verius

  • Michael Walz

  • Kerstin Jungnickel

  • December 4, 2024

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Global Assessment of Diagnostic Reference Levels According to Clinical Indications in Conventional Radiography

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionRadiation dose optimization in conventional radiography
Key MechanismsEstablishment and use of Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) based on clinical task, anatomical location, and procedural technique to optimize radiation exposure
Target PopulationAdult patients undergoing conventional X-ray (radiography) procedures
Care SettingRadiological departments in academic/non-academic hospitals and private practices across Austria, Germany, Italy, and Switzerland

Key Highlights

  • Clinical responsibility mandates limiting radiation to medically justified procedures and optimizing dose according to ALARA principles.
  • Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) are defined as the 3rd quartile of median dose values and serve as investigation levels to trigger dose optimization.
  • Clinical DRLs incorporate clinical task, anatomical location, and procedural technique for more precise dose optimization compared to anatomical DRLs alone.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Select imaging procedures based on clinical indication and guidelines to ensure medical justification.
  • Use clinical DRLs to define dose expectations for specific clinical tasks and procedural techniques.

Management

  • Implement dose optimization by adapting radiation exposure to clinical task, procedure complexity, anatomical location, and patient size.
  • Collaborate with radiation protection specialists (e.g., medical physicists) for protocol design and dose management.
  • Regularly review and update DRLs to harmonize exposure practices across institutions and countries.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Use dose management systems (DMS) to collect and analyze dose-related data (e.g., kerma-area product, PKA).
  • Investigate any continuous exceedance of DRLs and implement corrective measures.
  • Ensure periodic quality assurance of X-ray systems with dose measurement deviations less than 30%.

Risks

  • Exceeding DRLs may indicate unnecessary radiation exposure requiring investigation and optimization.
  • Inadequate dose optimization can lead to increased patient radiation risk without clinical benefit.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Adult patients (>16 years) undergoing conventional radiography procedures

Dose data collected from multiple institutions with experienced personnel showed consistent equipment and protocols, enabling definition of common clinical DRLs.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Define DRLs based on combined clinical task, anatomical location, and procedural technique (CAP approach) rather than anatomical location alone.
  • Use retrospective dose data from multiple institutions to establish harmonized clinical DRLs.
  • Engage experienced radiology staff and radiation protection specialists in dose optimization efforts.
  • Ensure dose data quality through validated dose management systems and adherence to international standards.

References

Original Source(s)

Related Content