Letter to Editor—Acetabular superior wall fractures: a distinct acetabular fracture entity - Scorecard - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Letter to the Editor: Superior Wall Fractures of the Acetabulum as a Distinct Fracture Type

  • By

  • Martin Salášek

  • Valér Džupa

  • November 11, 2026

Share

Clinical Scorecard: Letter to the Editor: Superior Wall Fractures of the Acetabulum as a Distinct Fracture Type

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionClinical topic addressed by the source article: Letter to the Editor
Key MechanismsMechanisms or clinical associations described in the source article.
Target PopulationPatients or participants described in the source article.
Care SettingClinical assessment and imaging of pediatric pelvic-region avulsion fractures; the letter reports a multicenter analysis and discusses conservative and surgical treatment options.

Key Highlights

  • A 16-year multicenter analysis identified 9 superior acetabular-region avulsions at the reflected-head origin among pediatric pelvic avulsion fractures.
  • All 9 patients were treated conservatively because displacement did not exceed 1 cm; no complications, non-union, or post-traumatic femoroacetabular impingement occurred in this small series.
  • Clinical findings and plain radiography are used for diagnosis; for an initially nondisplaced avulsion projecting at the superior acetabular margin, native hip MRI demonstrates the avulsion and can identify concomitant labral injury.
  • The authors state that MRI should be selected in preference to low-dose CT in pediatric patients.
  • Combined pelvic-ring and superior acetabular-wall injuries are described as extremely uncommon in children; none occurred in the reported group.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • The authors describe clinical findings and plain radiographs as part of assessment for reflected-head avulsion fractures.
  • For an initially nondisplaced avulsion projecting at the superior acetabular margin, the authors perform native hip MRI to demonstrate the avulsion and identify any concomitant intra-articular labral injury.
  • The authors state that MRI should be selected in preference to low-dose CT in pediatric patients.

Management

  • All 9 patients in the reported series were treated conservatively because displacement did not exceed 1 cm.
  • The letter notes earlier recommendations for open reduction and screw fixation through a limited Smith-Petersen approach when reflected-head avulsion displacement exceeded 1 cm; the procedure was comparatively frequently followed by paraarticular calcifications and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve neuropathy.
  • The letter describes an endoscopic stabilization method for fractures involving anterior inferior iliac spine and reflected-head avulsions. It reports fewer paraarticular calcifications and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve lesions; the principal advantage is the ability to treat a labral lesion concomitantly when required, while the stabilization technique has a longer learning curve.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • MRI can identify concomitant intra-articular labral injury.
  • The letter reports no complications, non-union, or post-traumatic femoroacetabular impingement among the 9 isolated reflected-head avulsions in its series.

Risks

  • Open reduction and screw fixation through the Smith-Petersen approach was comparatively frequently followed by paraarticular calcifications and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve neuropathy.
  • The letter states that post-traumatic femoroacetabular impingement is generally linked to dislocated avulsions exceeding 1.5 cm.
  • The endoscopic stabilization technique has a longer learning curve.

Patient & Prescribing Data

The multicenter analysis followed pediatric pelvic avulsion fractures over 16 years and identified 9 superior acetabular-region reflected-head avulsions. The patients participated in football (4), running (3), and other sports (2).

All 9 reflected-head avulsions were treated conservatively because displacement did not exceed 1 cm. The letter also describes earlier open fixation recommendations for displacement greater than 1 cm and a more recently described endoscopic stabilization method.

Clinical Best Practices

  • The authors distinguish reflected-head avulsions from anterior inferior iliac spine avulsions because their mechanisms differ.
  • For an initially nondisplaced avulsion projecting at the superior acetabular margin, the authors describe native hip MRI to assess the avulsion and any labral injury.
  • The authors state that MRI should be selected in preference to low-dose CT in pediatric patients.
  • The letter describes complications associated with open fixation and a longer learning curve for endoscopic stabilization.

Related Resources & Content

    Original Source(s)

    Related Content