AI in radiology and interventions: a structured narrative review of workflow automation, accuracy, and efficiency gains of today and what’s coming - Scorecard - MDSpire
Advertisement
AI in radiology and interventions: a structured narrative review of workflow automation, accuracy, and efficiency gains of today and what’s coming
Clinical Scorecard: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: A Comprehensive Review of Current Workflow Automation, Diagnostic Accuracy, and Future Efficiency Enhancements
At a Glance
Category
Detail
Condition
Diagnostic imaging and image-guided therapy workflows including cancer screening, lung screening, coronary stenting, and liver cryoablation
Key Mechanisms
AI/machine learning systems automate, improve, and provide new insights in imaging data reconstruction, analysis, prioritization, and procedural guidance under human oversight
Target Population
Patients undergoing MRI, CT, ultrasound, and interventional image-guided procedures across oncology, cardiology, and hepatology
Care Setting
Radiology departments and interventional suites within health systems integrating AI-enabled imaging workflows
Key Highlights
Over 1,247 AI-enabled medical devices authorized by FDA as of August 2025, with radiology comprising >75% of approvals
AI applications span automation (e.g., DL reconstruction), improvement (e.g., CAD triage), and new insights (e.g., wire-free physiology, opportunistic biomarkers)
Human-in-the-loop model emphasized with regulatory frameworks mandating oversight, data governance, bias monitoring, and post-market surveillance
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
Utilize AI to augment diagnostic accuracy in imaging modalities such as MRI and CT with validated deep learning algorithms
Apply AI-based lesion detection and characterization with demonstrated accuracy (e.g., 87.6% in MRI cancer screening)
Ensure external validation and bias assessment of AI tools prior to clinical deployment
Management
Adopt AI-enabled workflow automation where residual clinical risk is low and outputs are directly actionable under human supervision
Use AI to improve speed, accuracy, and consistency of clinician-led steps without replacing clinical judgment
Integrate AI-generated new insights cautiously, requiring further validation before automation
Monitoring & Follow-up
Implement continuous post-market monitoring and change control for AI systems to detect performance drift and maintain safety
Maintain transparency and interoperability standards in AI deployment
Conduct lifecycle monitoring aligned with risk-based regulatory frameworks
Risks
Recognize differing error profiles between AI and clinicians necessitating collaborative human-in-the-loop models
Avoid full automation in high-stake management decisions under uncertainty
Address potential bias and variability across sites and patient subgroups
Patient & Prescribing Data
Patients undergoing diagnostic imaging and interventional procedures in oncology, cardiology, and hepatology
AI-enabled devices improve diagnostic accuracy and workflow efficiency but require human oversight and prospective real-world validation to ensure clinical impact
Clinical Best Practices
Employ AI tools with demonstrated regulatory approval and clinical validation in the relevant imaging workflow steps
Maintain human oversight in all AI-assisted procedures to mitigate risks and ensure patient safety
Use risk-based frameworks to guide AI integration, emphasizing data governance, transparency, and bias monitoring
Continuously monitor AI system performance post-deployment to detect drift and maintain efficacy
Adopt a collaborative approach combining AI strengths with clinician expertise for optimal diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes