Evaluating transurethral resection of the prostate over twenty years: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials - Scorecard - MDSpire
Advertisement
Evaluating transurethral resection of the prostate over twenty years: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
Assess symptom improvement using IPSS and Qmax at 3 months, 1 year, and beyond 3 years postoperatively.
Evaluate for incidental prostate cancer and need for retreatment at 1 and 3 years.
Risks
Bleeding and need for blood transfusion are notable perioperative risks.
Risk of urinary incontinence, erectile dysfunction, and retrograde ejaculation postoperatively.
Potential for urethral stricture and bladder neck stenosis requiring further intervention.
Patient & Prescribing Data
Men with BPH undergoing TURP across various prostate sizes and symptom severities.
TURP provides significant and sustained improvement in IPSS (mean decrease ~16 points) and Qmax (mean increase ~12 ml/s) up to and beyond 3 years post-surgery, with better outcomes observed in more recent studies reflecting technological advances.
Clinical Best Practices
Ensure surgeon experience and training to minimize complications and optimize outcomes.
Select patients carefully, considering prostate size and anticoagulation status.
Use standardized outcome measures (IPSS, Qmax, PVR) for consistent monitoring.
Incorporate advances in endoscopic equipment and surgical techniques to improve efficacy and safety.
Counsel patients regarding potential sexual side effects and risks of retreatment.
by Joao G. Porto, Ansh M. Bhatia, Abhishek Bhat, Maria Camila Suarez Arbelaez, Ruben Blachman-Braun, Khushi Shah, Ankur Malpani, Diana Lopategui, Thomas R. W. Herrmann, Robert Marcovich, Hemendra N. Shah