Late enhancement and washout maps for distinguishing tumor progression from radiation necrosis in malignant brain tumors: an exploratory study - Scorecard - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

An Exploratory Study of Late Enhancement and Washout Maps to Differentiate Tumor Progression from Radiation Necrosis in Malignant Brain Tumors

  • By

  • Eya Khadhraoui

  • Leon Schmidt

  • Stefan Klebingat

  • I Erol Sandalcioglu

  • Roland Schwab

  • Philipp Arndt

  • Daniel Behme

  • Klaus-Peter Stein

  • Sebastian Johannes Müller

  • October 15, 2026

Share

Clinical Scorecard: An Exploratory Study of Late Enhancement and Washout Maps to Differentiate Tumor Progression from Radiation Necrosis in Malignant Brain Tumors

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionSuspected tumor progression, radiation necrosis, or pseudoprogression in adults with malignant brain tumors after treatment.
Key MechanismsCo-register post-contrast T1-weighted images acquired 5–9 and 25–29 minutes after contrast administration, normalize intensity, and subtract voxel-wise; maps display washout in red and delayed enhancement in green.
Target PopulationAdults with histologically confirmed glioblastoma, other WHO grade 3–4 glioma, CNS lymphoma, or brain metastasis whose follow-up MRI after surgery and radiochemotherapy showed a newly appearing contrast-enhancing lesion.
Care SettingSingle-center retrospective observational imaging study using follow-up MRI.

Key Highlights

  • The study examined whether delayed-enhancement and washout maps could help distinguish tumor progression from radiation necrosis.
  • Post-contrast T1-weighted images were acquired at 5–9 minutes and again at 25–29 minutes.
  • Washout maps were generated by co-registration, intensity normalization, and voxel-wise subtraction of the two T1-weighted datasets.
  • The MRI protocol also included DSC perfusion MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • The article describes an exploratory imaging method, not a clinical guideline or validated diagnostic recommendation.
  • Eligible cases had newly appearing contrast-enhancing lesions on follow-up MRI after surgery and radiochemotherapy.

Management

  • The source does not provide treatment recommendations based on washout-map findings.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • The source excerpt does not specify a monitoring schedule or reference-standard follow-up procedure.

Risks

  • The introduction notes that radiation necrosis and pseudoprogression may resemble tumor progression on conventional contrast-enhanced MRI.
  • Motion artifacts, absent contrast enhancement, or insufficient measurable enhancing volume can prevent washout-map computation.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Adults aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed glioblastoma, other WHO grade 3–4 glioma, CNS lymphoma, or brain metastasis and newly appearing enhancing lesions on follow-up MRI after surgery and radiochemotherapy.

The study evaluated imaging after surgery and radiochemotherapy. It reports no medication or treatment regimen recommendations.

Clinical Best Practices

  • The introduction describes difficulty distinguishing treatment-related changes from progression using conventional contrast-enhanced MRI.
  • The study protocol used paired post-contrast T1-weighted acquisitions at 5–9 and 25–29 minutes.
  • The study also assessed DSC perfusion and diffusion-weighted imaging alongside washout maps.
  • The introduction states that amino acid PET, particularly FET PET, may aid distinction when MRI findings are inconclusive; availability varies.

Related Resources & Content

Original Source(s)

Related Content