Objective:
To compare the efficacy and safety of intravitreal brolucizumab versus panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) in treatment-naïve patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).
Key Findings:
- Brolucizumab showed a mean gain of 0.2 letters in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), while PRP resulted in a decline of 4.2 letters, indicating a significant difference of 4.4 letters.
- 63.6% of patients treated with brolucizumab had no evidence of PDR at week 54 compared to 22.4% in the PRP group.
- Rates of center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) were lower with brolucizumab (31.1%) compared to PRP (72.7%).
- Overall ocular adverse events were less frequent in the brolucizumab group (34.3%) compared to PRP (49.1%).
Interpretation:
Limitations:
- Intraocular inflammation, including retinal vasculitis, was observed in 5.2% of brolucizumab-treated patients.
- The study primarily focused on treatment-naïve patients, which may limit generalizability.
Conclusion:
This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.