One sample contained beeswax markers, suggesting a pitch–beeswax mixture.
Statistical analysis revealed four to five distinct coating batches across the wreck.
Pollen assemblages indicated Mediterranean coastal and valley environments, with some samples linked to Brundisium.
Interpretation:
The distinct coating batches suggest successive repairs using materials sourced from different locations, reflecting local shipbuilding and repair traditions.
Limitations:
Alteration of archaeological samples may have affected molecular profiles.
Limited number of samples may not represent the entire vessel's repair history.
Conclusion:
The study highlights the importance of organic waterproofing materials in understanding ancient naval technologies and local shipbuilding practices.