Comparative evaluation of SBS and RASS for sedation assessment in mechanically ventilated children - Summary - MDSpire

Comparative evaluation of SBS and RASS for sedation assessment in mechanically ventilated children

  • By

  • Dan Li

  • Shan He

  • Qi Li

  • Jie Shen

  • Ping Tang

  • May 25, 2026

Share

Objective:

To evaluate the association and clinical agreement between the State Behavioral Scale (SBS) and the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) in mechanically ventilated children in the PICU.

Key Findings:
  • Strong positive correlation between RASS and SBS scores (r = 0.857, 95% CI: 0.841–0.873, p < 0.001).
  • Good agreement demonstrated by linear weighted kappa (weighted kappa = 0.821, 95% CI: 0.802–0.840, p < 0.001).
  • 64.7% of nurses found RASS more convenient and faster to use, while 54.9% considered it more reflective of clinical status.
Interpretation:

RASS showed good clinical agreement with SBS in mechanically ventilated children and may serve as a practical alternative for sedation assessment in the PICU.

Limitations:
  • Retrospective design may limit causality and introduce biases.
  • Survey lacked reliability and validity testing, which may affect the generalizability of nurse feedback.
Conclusion:

RASS may be an efficient alternative for sedation assessment in the PICU, contingent on standardized training and implementation procedures.

Original Source(s)

Related Content