Catheter stop orders may be losing ground - Summary - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Catheter stop orders may be losing ground

  • By

  • Andrea Surnit

  • October 19, 2026

  • 4 min

Share

Objective:

The article examines the objective, findings, and clinical context described in Catheter stop orders may be losing ground.

Approach:
  • Design: Repeated cross-sectional analysis of six national survey waves conducted every four years from 2005 through 2025.
  • Hospitals: Included 1,461 unique hospitals: 133 Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals and 1,328 nonfederal hospitals.
  • Measures: Assessed reported regular use of catheter removal strategies, alternative catheterization methods, monitoring systems, and infection surveillance.
Key Findings:
  • Regular use of catheter reminders or stop orders in nonfederal hospitals rose from 9% in 2005 to 49% in 2025, below the 2017 peak of 61%. In VA hospitals, use rose from 11% to 32%, after peaking at 48% in 2013.
  • In 2025, nurse-initiated catheter discontinuation was reported by 58% of nonfederal hospitals and 38% of VA hospitals. At least one reminder, stop-order, or nurse-initiated strategy was used regularly by 69% and 49%, respectively.
  • Daily rounds to assess catheter necessity were reported by 83% of nonfederal hospitals and 66% of VA hospitals in 2025.
  • By 2025, established CAUTI surveillance systems were reported by 98% of nonfederal hospitals and 99% of VA hospitals. Monitoring of catheter presence, duration, and discontinuation also increased substantially from 2005.
  • Regular use of external urinary catheters among female patients increased from 2021 to 2025, while nonfederal hospitals’ regular use of silver alloy Foley catheters declined from 32% in 2005 to 14% in 2025.
Interpretation:

The study documents improvements in surveillance and several prevention practices, alongside declines in reminder or stop-order use from earlier peaks. It assessed reported practices, not infection rates or patient outcomes, and therefore does not establish the clinical effects of these changes.

Limitations:
  • Practices were self-reported.
  • Potential nonresponse bias.
  • Hospital sampling changed across survey waves.
  • The study did not measure CAUTI rates or patient outcomes.
Conclusion:

The authors noted that catheterization duration is a modifiable risk factor and cited systematic reviews reporting approximately 50% lower CAUTI rates with catheter reminders or stop orders. They called for national surveys to help optimize prevention practices.

Sources:

Original Source(s)

Related Content