Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more
Advertisement
Catheter stop orders may be losing ground
A 20-year national survey reveals substantial gains in infection surveillance but inconsistent use of strategies to limit unnecessary urinary catheterization.
The article examines the objective, findings, and clinical context described in Catheter stop orders may be losing ground.
Approach:
Design: Repeated cross-sectional analysis of six national survey waves conducted every four years from 2005 through 2025.
Hospitals: Included 1,461 unique hospitals: 133 Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals and 1,328 nonfederal hospitals.
Measures: Assessed reported regular use of catheter removal strategies, alternative catheterization methods, monitoring systems, and infection surveillance.
Key Findings:
Regular use of catheter reminders or stop orders in nonfederal hospitals rose from 9% in 2005 to 49% in 2025, below the 2017 peak of 61%. In VA hospitals, use rose from 11% to 32%, after peaking at 48% in 2013.
In 2025, nurse-initiated catheter discontinuation was reported by 58% of nonfederal hospitals and 38% of VA hospitals. At least one reminder, stop-order, or nurse-initiated strategy was used regularly by 69% and 49%, respectively.
Daily rounds to assess catheter necessity were reported by 83% of nonfederal hospitals and 66% of VA hospitals in 2025.
By 2025, established CAUTI surveillance systems were reported by 98% of nonfederal hospitals and 99% of VA hospitals. Monitoring of catheter presence, duration, and discontinuation also increased substantially from 2005.
Regular use of external urinary catheters among female patients increased from 2021 to 2025, while nonfederal hospitals’ regular use of silver alloy Foley catheters declined from 32% in 2005 to 14% in 2025.
Interpretation:
The study documents improvements in surveillance and several prevention practices, alongside declines in reminder or stop-order use from earlier peaks. It assessed reported practices, not infection rates or patient outcomes, and therefore does not establish the clinical effects of these changes.
Limitations:
Practices were self-reported.
Potential nonresponse bias.
Hospital sampling changed across survey waves.
The study did not measure CAUTI rates or patient outcomes.
Conclusion:
The authors noted that catheterization duration is a modifiable risk factor and cited systematic reviews reporting approximately 50% lower CAUTI rates with catheter reminders or stop orders. They called for national surveys to help optimize prevention practices.
A large audit of biomedical publications suggests fabricated references are increasingly appearing in peer-reviewed papers — often in ways that are difficult for reviewers and readers to detect.