To directly compare a high-intensity, multidisciplinary TELE-based treatment program with standard FTF care among children and adolescents with obesity.
Approach:
Study Design: A randomized, parallel-group controlled trial comparing TELE-based multidisciplinary obesity treatment with standard FTF clinic-based care.
Participants: Children and adolescents aged 10–18 years with obesity, defined as a BMI at or above 2 standard deviations according to WHO growth references.
Interventions: TELE group received remote consultations via secure video conferencing, while FTF group received standard clinic care.
Key Findings:
TELE interventions may reduce travel-related barriers and improve accessibility for obesity treatment.
Children and adolescents are receptive to digital technologies, allowing integration with mobile health tools.
The study provides a direct comparison of TELE interventions and FTF care, addressing mixed results from previous research.
Interpretation:
The study aims to rigorously compare the effectiveness of TELE and FTF interventions for obesity treatment in children and adolescents.
Limitations:
Blinding of participants and care providers was not feasible due to the nature of the intervention.
The study's generalizability may be limited by specific inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Conclusion:
The study seeks to determine if high-intensity TELE interventions can achieve greater reductions in BMI z-score compared to standard FTF care.
