Is cognitive profiling in NF1 still optional? A systematic review of current assessment practices - Summary - MDSpire

Is cognitive profiling in NF1 still optional? A systematic review of current assessment practices

  • By

  • Andrea Santangelo

  • Alessandra Sardi

  • Luca Bergonzini

  • Ilaria Luongo

  • Federica Mela

  • Salvatore De Pasquale

  • Ilaria Cecconi

  • Maria Stella Vari

  • Duccio Maria Cordelli

  • Maria Cristina Diana

  • Pasquale Striano

  • April 30, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To evaluate current assessment practices for cognitive, behavioral, and neurodevelopmental domains in pediatric Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), emphasizing the need for standardized assessments.

Key Findings:
  • 84 studies met inclusion criteria, exploring 35 domains.
  • Cognitive functioning, executive functioning, behavior, and attention were the most frequently assessed domains.
  • Over 110 assessment tools were utilized, with a significant reliance on symptom rating scales rather than validated diagnostic instruments, raising concerns about diagnostic accuracy.
  • 52.4% of studies focused on children aged 6 years or older, indicating underrepresentation of preschool-aged children.
Interpretation:

Current assessment practices in pediatric NF1 are inconsistent and often overlook early developmental stages, highlighting the urgent need for standardized tools and early screening.

Limitations:
  • Heterogeneity in assessment practices limits comparability and may affect clinical outcomes.
  • Underrepresentation of younger children restricts early identification opportunities.
Conclusion:

Standardized, age-appropriate assessment tools and interdisciplinary approaches are essential for improving detection and management of NF1-related neurocognitive issues, addressing the urgent need for better practices.

Original Source(s)

Related Content